tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29600742611858461.post4154753534344341399..comments2024-03-29T10:41:59.623+00:00Comments on HMRC Is Shite: Mapeley In The NewsKen Frosthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13568488818950912374noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29600742611858461.post-84028344699741655102013-04-26T08:11:19.182+01:002013-04-26T08:11:19.182+01:00Well that has well and truly blown the lid off thi...Well that has well and truly blown the lid off this cesspit and it probably won't fit back on again as its in tatters now after this.<br />Time for a no-holds barred look into HMRC, there would appear to be a lot waiting to be uncovered in there.<br />Where though lies the true problem, is it chickenshit management in HMRC or higher up the greasy pole? Likely a combination of both with HMRC managers facilitating what goes on!<br />And people still wonder why the staff feel so disengaged or stressed - wake up out there.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29600742611858461.post-20058127381125787192013-04-26T07:46:24.896+01:002013-04-26T07:46:24.896+01:0007:41
Is this what you were referring to?
http:/...07:41<br /><br />Is this what you were referring to?<br /><br />http://article.wn.com/view/2013/04/26/Accountancy_firms_use_knowledge_of_Treasury_to_help_rich_avo/<br /><br />If so, well done to Margaret & Co!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29600742611858461.post-34326645306299370672013-04-26T07:41:10.301+01:002013-04-26T07:41:10.301+01:00So the PAC didn't get fooled again and has fin...So the PAC didn't get fooled again and has finally stated the obvious about the "infiltration" of global accountancy/financial private sector players embedding into the public sector. <br />Wonder what on earth prompted that?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29600742611858461.post-14256853139989386592013-04-25T22:20:53.902+01:002013-04-25T22:20:53.902+01:00Rights of occupation is one thing, but would HMRC ...Rights of occupation is one thing, but would HMRC be forced into paying an already (in theory) contracted compensatory amount in order to ensure continued occupation? <br /><br />Sell at reduced and then subsidised figure, pay extortionate fees for little service and then buy back at what amount.<br /><br />Begs the question where does the real ownership of the buildings lay and was it all smoke and mirrors again?<br /><br />As George W Bush said “There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again.” <br /><br />Wow!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29600742611858461.post-29325248899827413242013-04-25T21:41:33.835+01:002013-04-25T21:41:33.835+01:00All you need to know about Mapeley is that their p...All you need to know about Mapeley is that their property portfolio is highly leveraged and that one by one bits of its empire are going into administration<br /><br />http://costarfinance.com/2012/11/06/inside-mapeleys-distressed-uk-property-portfolio-cmbs-workouts/<br /><br />http://www.costar.co.uk/en/assets/news/2012/July/JLL-appointed-LPA-receiver-to-Mapeley-portfolio-full-property-list-revealed/<br /><br />For those who enjoy a good laugh it is well worth reading Jim Cousins grilling of HMRC's Messrs Tullet,Burt and King before the Treasury Select Committee in 2008. This was the exchange about the risk of a Mapeley default to the HMRC estate<br /><br /><i> 25 JUNE 2008<br /><br /> Q80 Jim Cousins: What do you now know about what would happen if Mapeley did go into default, did go into receivership, did go bust, because that is clearly an issue which you have considered? What would happen?<br /><br /> Mr King: What would happen is the same as was the position at the start of the contract, in that were Mapeley to go into receivership obviously our interest is in protecting our offices and our staff, so we have rights of occupation, we have rights to -<br /><br /> Q81 Jim Cousins: What rights of occupation do you have? What is the term of them?<br /><br /> Mr King: I am not sure. I will have to come back to you on that.[15] </i><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29600742611858461.post-7863530383897838962013-04-25T17:18:53.812+01:002013-04-25T17:18:53.812+01:00About time the FDA & CPS took a leaf from the ...About time the FDA & CPS took a leaf from the USA ICE Union, see link:-<br /><br />http://www.cis.org/articles/2010/259-259-vote-no-confidence.pdf<br /><br />the background to this is from the following link:-<br /><br />http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread942872/pg1<br /><br />it begs the question WTF is going on in the UK?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29600742611858461.post-42252548020647855642013-04-25T15:03:26.444+01:002013-04-25T15:03:26.444+01:00An interesting rumour that did the rounds is that ...An interesting rumour that did the rounds is that the contract includes a sort of forced by-back option which Mapeley can invoke should they feel the need.<br /><br />Of course this would be nothing more than the bitter musings of ex.staff, but for a little niggling feeling that there is a lot more mileage in this scandal than the Eye uncovered.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29600742611858461.post-46770714376008608862013-04-25T12:31:51.186+01:002013-04-25T12:31:51.186+01:00This needs to be considered carefully. Although ho...This needs to be considered carefully. Although hopefully not by dear old Amos, sorry Amyas!<br /><br />HMC&E & IR "sells" the buildings at prices many professionals agree was way under market price. Mapeley then plead poverty and are "granted" funds to support purchase of said buildings.<br /><br />Mapeley rent back the buildings to vendors at vastly inflated amounts (commercially confidential) and charge service/management fees to look after buildings not fit for human occupation and with slowly evaporating "services".<br /><br />Oh yes, and then there was the possible conflict of interest between av ery high ranking manager from the public sector in post at HMC&E, his wife and an offshore company which turns out to be ...?<br /><br />This was all clearly reported and investigated by Private Eye at the time, and generally reported by main stream media.<br /><br />Quite how anyone should be surprised by HMRC paying huge amounts of customers taxe revenues to tax free destinations via offshore linked companies is beyond me.<br /><br />Of course HMRC will state that where a company pays its taxes (or not) is up to them - BS!<br />Ever heard of ethics especially when dealing with the tax proceeds of honest law-abiding UK taxpayers?<br />Fecking Hypocrites, but thats what happens when the fox looks after the coop, and they don't even bother to try and hide it anymore.<br />Now that should concern the sheeple!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com