Tuesday, 13 January 2026

HMRC's Trivial Pursuit: Chasing 300,000 Taxpayers for Pocket Change While the Helplines Stay Silent



Morning, you hardworking mugs still waiting for that refund or trying to get through to an adviser without losing the plot. While HMRC's own staff rack up half a million sick days and Fujitsu finally gets the boot, the taxman has found time to bombard over 300,000 ordinary workers and pensioners with what can only be described as "trivial" tax demands – tiny little bills for peanuts that probably cost more to send than they're worth.

Fresh FOI figures for the 2023-24 tax year reveal a record 1.32 million simple assessments – double the average of the previous six years. Of those, a whopping 317,000 were for £100 or less, and nearly half (647,000, or 49%) demanded £300 or less. That's right: HMRC is spending your money printing, posting, and chasing brown envelopes for amounts that wouldn't cover a decent night out or a tank of petrol these days.

These "simple" assessments are meant to spare people the horror of full self-assessment – fair enough if it's straightforward. But when you're hitting pensioners who've never considered themselves "taxpayers" before, just because a frozen personal allowance (£12,570, stuck since 2021 and now extended to 2031) plus a rising state pension tips them over by a few quid? That's not simplification; that's bureaucratic bullying.

The rise is pure fiscal drag – thresholds frozen while everything else creeps up – pulling more folk into the net by stealth. Experts like Ian Futcher from Quilter call it exactly that: a steady creep that's now forcing HMRC to administer "nothing more than £100" while piling shock and hassle on recipients who thought their tax was sorted.

And the cherry on top? Former pensions minister Steve Webb (now at LCP) points out that in some cases, the cost of collecting these trivial sums probably exceeds what they raise. Yet HMRC's boss has defended using debt collectors for as little as £89. Brilliant priorities: hound grannies for a tenner while the phone lines stay jammed and refunds take years.

Rachel Reeves promised in her Budget that from April 2027, pure state pensioners won't get chased for "small amounts" via simple assessments. How generous – after years of this nonsense. Meanwhile, savers, workers with a bit of interest, or anyone else caught in the drag keep getting the brown envelope treatment. And good luck querying it when the hold music is longer than a tax year.

This is peak HMRC: obsessed with squeezing every last penny from the little people, no matter how inefficient, while the big systemic cock-ups (Horizon anyone?) drag on forever.

Tax does have to be taxing.

But wasting resources on trivia while ignoring real incompetence? That's just taking the mickey.

Amazon "Brown Envelope Survival Kit" Suggestions

HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

18 comments:

  1. HMRC are nothing but bullies - they even get off on bullying their own colleagues.

    This is what happens when all the skilled staff exit the organisation (Building Our Future, anyone) and are replaced by unskilled, uneducated employees dragged in off the street; instead of pursuing those who are evading significant amounts of tax, they pursue the little people for peanuts to justify their existence.

    Farage, Burger et al will need to get tough on this vile mob of c**ts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. They're sorry and want to apologize.

    I don't give a shit personally how sorry you are. If you were, you'd resign and the rodents responsible should be fired. Damage limitation the PAC until it's out of the media cycle.

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/jan/13/hmrc-wrongly-targeted-child-benefit-crackdown

    ReplyDelete
  3. Back in the C&E days we were told not to issue VAT assessments for less than £500 as it wouldn't be cost effective to pursue.
    But everyone wasn't obsessed by statistics back then.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I worked in the former Inland Revenue and after the merger, I found former C&E staff somewhat cavalier in their approach to everything. They weren't all bad people, but their egos were driven by institutional arrogance.

      It's the C&E side of the equation that made HMRC the shitshow that it is. The Revenue attitude was not to pursue anything under £100 but £500, years ago, before the hyperinflation of recent years, that is an absolute disgrace. Typical of Customs. We had some very scruffy, smelly and uneducated VAT Assurance Officers from their mob in our office, they hated traders with a passion and had the attitude of pigs.

      Delete
    2. @10:00. Well done, a particularly deranged post. If you had actually worked for HMRC you would know that C&E had virtually zero input into the new department.
      "Scruffy, smelly and uneducated" leads me to suspect that you may actually be that rather quaint chap who posts on here occasionally - the one claiming to be a top accountant who thinks anyone not privately edited is educationally sub-normal.
      As for the "hyperinflation of recent years", where does one even start. The UK has never had hyperinflation and last had stagflation in 1975.

      Delete
    3. "Scruffy" Haha. I love reading stories from those who've been inside HMRC. Many years ago, a client and I had a meeting with a VAT officer and it was unforgettable. The officer had spilt his breakfast and dinner over his suit, struggled to knot his tie, and forgotten to both brush his teeth and comb his hair that day. My female client felt very uneasy. What a buch of characters they are.

      Delete
    4. @13:46. An early contender for the 'this never happened' of the year award.

      Delete
    5. @15 January 2026 at 18:01
      Apologies for the delayed reply older chap, some of have work to do and taxes to pay - all those welfare handouts come at a cost.
      It categirically *did happen* and, frankly, the gentleman was fairly representative of the typical VAT officer you would meet back in the days of local offices. Hope that helps clarify, and wish you well for a lovely rest of your day, old bean.

      Delete
    6. @10:00 Corruption is rife so as long as they aren't taking bribes etc, that's the most important thing. But yes, you'd be sacked for showing up for work in that state in the private sector.

      Delete
    7. @14:41.
      Corruption is not rife.
      HMRC staff do not take bribes.
      I have met many private sector staff who look and dress like tramps.

      Apart from that a great post.

      Delete
    8. @14:41 and @15:24
      The low expectations and standards of HMRC staff is astounding

      Delete
    9. @16:16. Precisely what "low expectations and standards"?
      You do realise most of these posts are pure invention by nutters?

      Delete
    10. @15:24 on 16 January 2026
      "HMRC staff do not take bribes"
      That's fantastic to hear, but what evidence do you have to support this assertion, Mr Assertions R Us?

      Delete
    11. @14:56. What evidence does the previous poster have that they do take bribes? Not one jot.
      My opinion is based on the fact that no member of HMRC staff has ever been charged with taking bribes. Which is pretty significant unless you're a "they're all part of the plot" conspiracy internet nutter.

      Delete
  4. Hang on fiscal drag isn't HMRCs fault. Tax thresholds have been frozen since 2022. So blame successive governments but don't blame HMRC for enforcing it

    ReplyDelete
  5. John Claude Van Damme or whatever he's called is trying to cover his arse by the sounds of it

    HMRC are about as genuine as a Marshmallow Teapot.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/money/hmrc-mps-treasury-committee-scottish-government-government-b2899595.html

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree re comments on Customs people . I am ex IR and when we merged I got a job as a special investigator working with ex Customs people . I stayed 6 months and requested to return to my former IR job. The people weee racist sexiest and bullies. It was like working with people from the 1970’s !!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Strange how since I mentioned C&E two days ago there's been a totally insane anti-Customs pile on.
    Couldn't possibly be co-ordinated?

    ReplyDelete