Morning, you poor sods still reeling from the last self-assessment deadline, nursing your coffee while HMRC's hold music echoes in your nightmares. From 6 April 2026 (that's next month, folks), if your combined gross income from self-employment and/or property tops £50,000 (dropping to £30k in 2027 and £20k in 2028), HMRC is ditching the once-a-year Self Assessment bliss and shoving Making Tax Digital for Income Tax Self Assessment (MTD ITSA) down your throat. No more one annual return – instead, you'll be forced to keep digital records and submit quarterly updates to the taxman, plus an End of Period Statement and a final declaration by the usual 31 January deadline.
Why the hell are they doing this? HMRC spins it like it's Christmas come early: "modernisation", "better tax management", "real-time insights". Translation: they want your data more often, more accurately, and with less chance for you to "forget" a few quid here and there. Here's their official fairy tale:
- "Helps you stay on top of your tax affairs" – Quarterly updates give you a running view of your income/expenses so you can estimate your bill and avoid January heart attacks. (As if we didn't already know we're skint.)
- "Improves compliance and accuracy" – Digital records fed straight to HMRC mean fewer errors, less evasion, and more timely info for them to spot dodgy patterns early.
- "Supports business planning and growth" – Knowing your numbers quarterly supposedly makes you a better entrepreneur. (Bollocks – it just adds admin when you're already juggling invoices, clients, and life.)
- "Closes the tax gap" – More frequent peeks let HMRC nudge you (or fine you) sooner if something looks off, theoretically raising extra revenue (though their own estimates have been slashed from £6.3bn to £4.3bn while costs balloon to £1.4bn – classic HMRC efficiency).
The real reasons? Control and cash. Annual filings let you batch everything once a year – easy to miss a receipt or two, easy for HMRC to miss you in the backlog. Quarterly means you're feeding them cumulative summaries every three months (deadlines like 7 August, 7 November, etc., for tax-year quarters), giving them a live feed into your finances. It's the same logic as MTD for VAT: force digital, force frequency, force compliance – or face penalty points (two in two years = £200 fine, though new joiners get a soft landing on the first four misses).
But let's call it what it is: another layer of bureaucratic hell piled on the self-employed and landlords who already drown in red tape. HMRC can't answer phones on deadline day, takes years for refunds, issues phantom £2.8bn demands, and lets their own staff launder millions without jail – yet they've got the brass neck to demand four extra submissions a year from you, backed by compatible software (no more simple spreadsheets unless bridged), or face points and fines.
This isn't about helping you; it's about helping them squeeze more tax with less effort on their end. While you upload receipts and categorise expenses quarterly, their helplines stay jammed, their IT crashes, and their valuation army grows for the next mansion tax raid.
But turning your annual headache into a quarterly migraine while HMRC's own house remains a shambles? That's not modernisation – that's mandated misery, courtesy of the same clowns who can't organise a phone queue.
Amazon "Quarterly Submission Survival Kit" Suggestions
(affiliate links – because you'll need these for the four-times-a-year joy)
- Digital Receipt Scanner – turn paper into pixels before HMRC demands it
- Extra Monitor – for juggling software, spreadsheets, and rage tabs
- "I Submit Quarterly So HMRC Can Spy" Mug – ironic morning fuel
- Noise-Cancelling Headphones – drown out the portal crash screams
- Calendar & Reminder App – miss a deadline, miss your sanity
Tax does have to be taxing.
HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Off-topic - Found this HMRC convict https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/scottish-news/8666207/james-mcgee-taxman-dead-man-fraud/ from 2022. Missed it at the top.
ReplyDeleteI worked with a vile Jim with a very similar name in DMB many years ago.
Is there anyone with a scintilla of ingrity working at HMRC?
DeleteSeems like criminal after criminal
Not many with integrity.
DeleteFriend who works there said the place is full of scandals and corruption.
@17:40.
DeleteSo yet another anonymous 'friend' in yet another unnamed office attests to yet more unspecified scandals and corruption.
I'm shocked. Utterly shocked and appalled.
They're corrupt to the core!!!
ReplyDeleteHMRC staff are laundering millions with impunity? A former taxman has been sent down for VAT fraud? A former HMRC workplace bully is now the Chair of a Parish Council? A current HMRC Field Force agent in Norfolk damaged a taxpayer's garage door and got away with it? A former HMRC office worker behaved in a lecherous 'handy' manner at parties and got away with it? Another bullying Field Force senior manager lodged a claim against HMRC at Employment Tribunal but mysteriously withdrew his claim, with suggestions he was paid off with taxpayers' cash? HMRC staff caught out being treated to luxury pool cars, including BMWs? But HMRC refusing to be forthcoming when an FOI was made about it?
ReplyDeleteThese are just some of the amazing and shocking stories contributors have bravely shared on here in the last six months. There's hundreds more out there waiting to exposed.
When will this horrible, scandal-ridden mob be brought to book!?
There are indeed some wrong un's in HMRC, as one would probably expect from such a large organisation. Thankfully it appears that they are usually found out, hence former staff being jailed.
DeleteMany of the examples you quote are unverified allegations from people with an axe to grind. I myself have been accused on this site of sexually assaulting both female and male colleagues and taking bribes off accountants. When pushed my accusors couldn't even name the office where I worked. So I wouldn't believe everything you read.
I'm particularly interested in your suggestion that staff are laundering millions with impunity. Any evidence?
@14:43
DeleteI'm intrigued as to the allegations against yourself. Please could provide details as to their veracity. Also, puzzled as to how someone could make allegations about an anonymous poster?
I believe many of the allegations repeated by the above poster have been shown to be true.
Imo, the work of HMRC should be outsourced to the private sector (while putting necessary safeguards in place to mitigate the risk of a conflict of interest). It is plain that HMRC is unable to attract staff with brains, class and integrity.
The lady doth protest too much 👻 🤣🤣🤣
Delete@15:53.
DeleteAt the time the accusations were made I was not posting anonymously - Ken would be able to confirm this. However I have also been accused of misdeeds while posting anonymously - bizarre I know.
The allegations against me have no veracity, so there are no details to give. As for the above post, the money laundering, bullying Parish councillor, damaged garage door, inappropriate behaviour at parties and withdrawn Tribunal claim are all unverified and therefore basically gossip. Some may be true, some may not.
And the BMW/FoI case is still ongoing.
The "wrong un's" at HMRC need to be put before courts and shown to the inside of a prison cell.
Delete@20:49. They have been.
Delete@17:31 There's A LOT more waiting to be exposed and prosecuted. They need harsh, unrelenting punishment to serve as a warning to all the other HMRC staff as to the consequences of committing crime and misconduct in public office.
Delete@21:59. If you know for sure that there's a lot more waiting to be exposed what do you intend to do about exposing it?
DeleteRhetorical question I suppose - sweet FA as usual.
I hope there's a change of government, one with an IQ higher than a goldfish, that just abolishes this nonsense altogether.
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't rule it out completely.
Anyone with the financial means will leave the UK, although some destinations aren't as attractive as they were a few weeks ago. HMRC has been hollowed out for the past quarter of a century. It stopped being fit for purpose a long time ago.
Enjoy The Show. ;)
HMRC do NOT obtain DBS checks for any of their staff …. This means that criminals may well be working at HMRC with access to all our personal information
ReplyDeleteAccording to the Civil Service Careers website all successful candidates for jobs in HMRC have to undergo a DBS check.
DeleteSo either they're lying or you are.
I know who my money's on.
The biggesr risk is that current HMRC employees are not re-vetted as would happen periodically (at least every 5-10 years) in any other professional organisation.
Delete@21:02.
DeleteSo if a current employee of HMRC was found guilty of a criminal offence their employer wouldn't know about it?
You're getting a bit desperate now.