HMRC Blows £175m on Fancy AI Toy from Quantexa – Because Nothing Says “We’ve Fixed Customer Service” Like Another Expensive Tech Fantasy
Morning, you long-suffering taxpayers still stuck on hold for an hour, waiting two years for a refund, or filling in quarterly MTD returns while HMRC’s own staff take half a million sick days.
In their latest act of breathtaking delusion, HM Revenue and Customs has just signed a 10-year, £175 million deal with British tech firm Quantexa. That’s £17.5 million a year of your money going on some AI-powered wizardry that’s supposedly going to magically transform the taxman from a national embarrassment into a sleek, efficient machine.
Quantexa’s system will hoover up HMRC’s data, mix it with external sources, and then – allegedly – help spot fraud, hidden company networks, and even “fix unintentional errors” faster. It’ll also supposedly assist customer service staff. Yes, the same customer service that’s been in freefall for years.
Let me translate the corporate bollocks into plain English:
HMRC admits their performance is so dire that public dissatisfaction is rising, so instead of fixing the basics — answering the bloody phone, processing refunds in less than 18 months, or stopping phantom £2.8 billion demands to corner shops — they’ve decided to throw £175 million at an AI system.
This is classic HMRC behaviour. Their IT track record is legendary for all the wrong reasons (remember Fujitsu? Horizon? The endless MTD delays?). Now they’re banking on AI to do what competent management and proper staffing have failed to do for over a decade.
Here’s what this shiny new toy will actually be brilliant at:
- Finding more ways to hammer small businesses and self-employed people for minor errors
- Spotting “suspicious” expense claims from sole traders earning £60k
- Building even bigger databases on every one of us
- Generating more automated penalty points
And here’s what it almost certainly won’t fix:
- The hour-long hold music torture
- Two-year refund delays
- Deadline day phone hang-ups
- Pension tax calculation cock-ups
- Trivial £47 demands to pensioners
£175 million. That’s enough to answer the phones properly for years. Enough to sort the backlog. Enough to give decent service to the people who actually pay their wages. Instead, it’s going on another grand “digital transformation” project that will probably end up costing double and delivering half while some consultants laugh all the way to the bank.
This is what happens when a failing organisation refuses to admit the problem is management, culture, and accountability — not lack of fancy tech.
Tax does have to be taxing.
But when HMRC spends £175 million on AI to “improve performance” while the basics remain an absolute disgrace, it’s not taxing — it’s institutional denial on an industrial scale.
Well done, JP Marks and the rest of the gang. Another shiny toy to play with while the public seethes.
Amazon “HMRC AI Overlords Survival Kit” Suggestions
(affiliate links – because you’ll need these while the robots come for your records)
- Tinfoil Hat – protect yourself from the all-seeing AI
- “Another £175m Down the Drain” Mug – morning tea essential
- Noise-Cancelling Headphones – for the inevitable longer hold times
- Heavy-Duty Shredder – in case the AI gets too nosey
- Strong Whisky – medicinal, after reading your next tax calculation
HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"
Mecca Bingo Maureen will sleep a lot easier now.
ReplyDeleteI'd find it very interesting if the AI tools were directed inwards at HMRC and the billions of our money they've pissed up the wall for the last 20 years.
Will it help them to expose misconduct and criminal behaviour within their own workforce?
ReplyDeleteIf not, this is a gigantic waste of law abiding taxpayers' money.
I gave HMRC evidence of lawbreaking. Their response? They covered it up and refused to even refer it to Internal Goverance. I witnessed up close evil and corruption
Delete@16:33.
DeleteDid you take the matter to the Adjudicator's Office?
Did you take the matter to the Parliamentary Ombudsman?
Did you give your evidence of lawbreaking to the police?
If not why not?
Please give us the full story.
Why didn’t you refer it to internal governance then? There is even an anonymous reporting tool to make it easy
DeleteQuantexa specialise in box connecting, fine. I asked AI about it, they suggested they were chosen so there's a full audit trail. Literal translation, if it goes to shit they can cover their arse and blame someone else
ReplyDeleteClaude Anthropic went into IBM and remapped COBOL CODE from the 1980s there's nobody to manage it anymore, Claude Code did it very quickly and wiped a lot of value off the share price. Claude has something called MYTHOS they won't release, do you think HMRC computer systems held together with two elastic bands and a hamster are highly vulnerable?
HMRC could do the job themselves with Claude Code and a few technical people for a lot less than 175 million. Do they have the staff?
Maybe Rupert Lowe can ask some awkward questions at the PAC.
HMRC lacks the quality staff of the private sector, so no.
DeleteThey may as well put the number in the public domain.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/consumer-affairs/hmrc-gives-trans-people-access-to-vip-hotline/