At the
beginning of July I noted that HMRC had issued a consultation on Extra Statutory Concession AS19, and that:
"HMRC are proposing a significant watering down of ESC A19".
Under ESC A19, which has been a feature of the UK's tax system for around 40 years, tax
arrears may be waived when HMRC has failed to use information available
to it to assess an individual's tax liabilities on time.
The
Tax Faculty of the ICAEW is none too impressed with the proposed revisions to A19 either, and has set out its views; a.o. it notes:
"we do not
agree with the removal of the reasonable belief test and its replacement
by a responsibilities test in the form set out in this consultation
document. As currently drafted the test is not acceptable.
The
responsibilities for taxpayers are too onerous and unclear. The
responsibilities for HMRC are limited and insufficiently rigorous.....
..until it can be shown that HMRC’s operation of the
PAYE system is consistently meeting an agreed service standard, the
exceptional circumstances test should be kept...
..we think the
proposed requirement for taxpayers to contact HMRC before the end of the
tax year in which the underpayment is notified is not reasonable."
Here are the Faculty's views in full:
"The concession should not be revised on the lines proposed by HMRC
ICAEW does not support
HMRC’s proposed revision of Extra-statutory Concession (ESC) A19,
although we agree that a review is needed of the concession and how it
is operated.
The current concession and the proposals
Under
ESC A19, HMRC will write off income tax and capital gains tax where
HMRC has been slow to use information and tell the taxpayer about an
underpayment, and the taxpayer could reasonably have believed their tax
was correct.
· To replace the ‘reasonable belief’ test with a responsibilities test.
· To scrap the ‘exceptional circumstances’ test, which (broadly) applies where HMRC has made repeated failures.
· To restrict ESC A19 to income tax, ie it would no longer apply to CGT.
· To introduce a time limit for taxpayers to ask for ESC A19 to be applied.
The Tax Faculty’s views on the proposals
ESC A19 is an
important concession which provides fairness for taxpayers where HMRC is
at fault. We should like to emphasise the importance of retaining it
within the tax system.
We agree that a review
of ESC A19 is needed. There are difficulties with the operation of the
concession in its current form, particularly the application of the
‘reasonable belief’ test.
However, we do not
support the proposed revised text of ESC A19 as set out in the
consultation document. It should not be introduced in April 2013. In
particular, the responsibilities test as drafted is not fair or workable
(though there may be merits in such a test – see below), and we do not
agree with the other proposals which restrict the scope of the
concession.
1. Responsibilities test v reasonable belief test
There is evidence that
the current ‘reasonable belief’ test does cause difficulties and is not
being applied consistently by HMRC. In establishing whether a taxpayer
‘could reasonably have believed that his or her tax affairs were in
order’, it is hard to remove a degree of subjectivity.
A responsibilities
test would mean, in broad terms, that if HMRC has failed to meet its
responsibilities but the taxpayer has met theirs, ESC A19 can apply.
This has the potential to make the application of ESC A19 more objective
and therefore fairer for the taxpayer, and has worked well in the
context of disputed tax credit overpayments. Therefore we think the idea
should be explored further.
However, we do not
agree with the removal of the reasonable belief test and its replacement
by a responsibilities test in the form set out in this consultation
document. As currently drafted the test is not acceptable. The
responsibilities for taxpayers are too onerous and unclear. The
responsibilities for HMRC are limited and insufficiently rigorous. And
most importantly, no such test should be introduced until HMRC is able
to provide clear information for taxpayers about their responsibilities
and how to fulfil them.
We
think that ESC A19 should be retained in its current form, ie with the
reasonable belief test, and not be replaced unless and until a workable
responsibilities test can be devised. In the meantime HMRC should
work on improving the operation of the reasonable belief test, and on
developing better information and guidance for taxpayers on ESC A19 and
on PAYE matters generally.
2. Exceptional circumstances
The exceptional
circumstances test is designed to deal with situations where HMRC makes
repeated failures. HMRC argues that the advent of the NPS system, and
RTI from next year, should mean that is processed in a more timely
fashion, and thus remove the need for the exceptional circumstances test
in future. However, until it can be shown that HMRC’s operation of the
PAYE system is consistently meeting an agreed service standard, the
exceptional circumstances test should be kept.
3. Capital gains tax
While we accept that
ESC A19 is not likely to apply often to CGT, we can envisage situations
where it could. We see no need to narrow the scope of the concession
without good reason Therefore the ESC A19 should continue to apply to
CGT.
4. Time limits
We have no objection
to introducing a time limit for claiming ESC A19. We agree that it is
better if taxpayers approach HMRC sooner rather than later.
However, we think the
proposed requirement for taxpayers to contact HMRC before the end of the
tax year in which the underpayment is notified is not reasonable. If an
underpayment was notified in (say) March, it would be unfair to expect
the taxpayer to contact HMRC before 6 April.
If there is to be a
time limit, we propose a four-year limit in line with the current limit
for claims, with an additional limit of one year from when the
underpayment is notified if this gives a later date than the four-year
limit."
Tax does have to be taxing.
Professional Cover Against the Threat of Costly TAX and VAT Investigations
Insurance to protect you against the cost of enquiry or dispute with HMRC is available from several sources including Solar Taxwise.
Ken Frost has negotiated a 10% discount on any polices that may suit your needs.
However, neither Ken Frost nor HMRCISSHITE either endorses or recommends their services.
What is
TAXWISE?
TAXWISE is a tax-fee protection service that will pay up to £75,000 towards your accountant's fees in the event of an HM Revenue & Customs full enquiry or dispute.
To find out more, please use this link
Taxwise
Tax Investigation for Dummies, by Nick Morgan, provides a good and easy to read guide for anyone caught up in an HMRC tax investigation. A must read for any Self Assessment taxpayer.
Click the link to read about:
Tax Investigation for Dummies
HMRC Is Shite (
www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain
www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by
www.kenfrost.com "
The Living Brand"