Angela Rayner and the Labour Party's Tax Advice Bill

It has emerged that Angela Rayner has had specialist tax advice covered by the Labour Party.

The party commissioned leading barrister Jonathan Peacock KC to review Rayner's tax position, focusing primarily on whether she had underpaid stamp duty on her £700,000–£800,000 flat purchase in Hove, East Sussex. This advice also covered related matters such as council tax, capital gains tax, and inheritance tax implications. 

Peacock reportedly spent up to five days on the task, delivering draft advice on 1 September 2025 and final advice the following day. Rayner had requested the legal input from the party, and senior Labour officials arranged for Peacock's involvement. The bill was paid by party headquarters — a decision that has drawn sharp criticism from some within Labour itself, who have described it as a "shameful use of party resources" amid the party's post-election financial pressures, including a reported £3.8 million deficit.

The exact cost remains undisclosed, but tax and legal experts estimate it could run into tens of thousands of pounds. 

No declaration appears in the parliamentary Register of Members’ Financial Interests for this benefit. As of early 2026, searches of the register (available via parliament.uk and monitoring sites) show no entry under relevant categories like gifts, benefits, donations, or miscellaneous support from the Labour Party.

There are also no public indications that Rayner has reported the value of this advice as a benefit in kind to HMRC. Under UK tax rules (Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003), payments by an employer or equivalent body (here, the party in relation to her deputy leadership role) for personal legal advice are generally taxable unless tied directly to work duties. 

Since this concerned her private property and family trust arrangements — unrelated to parliamentary or official responsibilities — analysts argue it would likely be treated as a taxable benefit, potentially leaving Rayner liable for income tax (and possibly National Insurance) on its value.

This revelation comes against the backdrop of Rayner's earlier stamp duty controversy. She admitted underpaying around £40,000 in higher-rate stamp duty on the Hove flat (treated as a second home due to trust arrangements for her children), self-referred to the prime minister's ethics adviser, and cooperated with HMRC. The ministerial standards probe found she breached the code, contributing to her resignation as deputy prime minister, housing secretary, and deputy Labour leader.

While the original tax underpayment was settled (with potential penalties), this party-funded advice has raised fresh questions about transparency, declarations, and possible additional tax liabilities.

Doubtless HMRC will now be aware of this, even if she hasn't yet declared it.

HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Under 10% Signed Up for MTD ITSA

 

Under 10% Signed Up for MTD ITSA: HMRC's Digital Dream Is Turning Into the Taxpayer's Worst Nightmare – And They're Still Forcing It Down Our Throats

Greetings, you reluctant guinea pigs. Here we are in March 2026, just weeks away from the April 6 start date for Making Tax Digital for Income Tax Self Assessment (MTD ITSA), and the latest figures are in: fewer than 10% of the first mandatory cohort have actually signed up and joined the digital hellscape. Less than one in ten of the roughly 700,000–800,000 sole traders and landlords earning £50,000+ gross from self-employment or property have bothered (or managed) to register for MTD ITSA.

Let that sink in. HMRC has spent years (and billions of our money) hyping this as the greatest thing since sliced bread – quarterly digital updates, real-time tax estimates, better cashflow planning, closing the tax gap, blah blah blah. They've delayed it multiple times, thrown soft landings at new joiners, and still the uptake is pathetic. Under 10%. That's not "slow start"; that's a mass boycott by apathy and terror.

Why the ghost town?

• Nobody trusts HMRC's tech – The same clowns who crash on deadline day, lose your records, issue £2.8bn phantom demands to corner shops, and can't answer a phone without an hour of Vivaldi torture expect you to link your bank feeds, categorise every receipt quarterly, and trust their portals won't eat your data? Pull the other one.
• It's extra work for zero benefit – You still pay tax annually (or twice with payments on account). The "real-time estimate" is just another screen you have to check. Quarterly summaries mean four deadlines instead of one, software costs (£8–£30/month for QuickBooks/Xero etc.), endless receipt scanning, and the looming threat of penalty points if you slip. For what? So HMRC gets live surveillance on your finances? Cheers, but no thanks.
• The software is a minefield – Even the "simple" bridging tools are clunky, bank feeds fail, categorisation rules are a moving target, and if your setup is slightly non-standard (partnerships delayed, mixed income, overseas property), good luck finding compatible kit without paying through the nose.
• Fear of the unknown – Pensioners, older landlords, and low-tech sole traders are staring at this like it's alien technology. Forums are full of "I'm not doing it until they force me" posts. Many are gambling on HMRC's legendary enforcement sloth – miss the first few updates, see what happens.
• They've been caught lying about the numbers before – HMRC's own cost-benefit forecasts have been revised downward repeatedly. Original revenue windfall promises slashed, compliance costs ballooned to £1.4bn+. Taxpayers smell a rat: this isn't about helping us; it's about control and eventual mandatory payments-on-account creep.

And what’s HMRC's response to this resounding "no thanks"? Crickets, vague press releases about "strong progress" (under 10% is strong?), and quiet threats that non-sign-ups will eventually get auto-enrolled or penalty-pointed into submission. Reeves still bangs on about "modernising the tax system" while her department hires 1,000 valuation officers for the mansion tax raid and lets Rayner's stamp duty probe drag on forever.

This pathetic signup rate is the clearest signal yet: MTD ITSA is not wanted, not needed, and not trusted. It's a solution looking for a problem, built by people who can't run their own organisation without half a million sick days a year. The first cohort is voting with their feet – or rather, with their inaction.

But forcing quarterly digital shackles on people who can't even be arsed to sign up? That's not taxing – that's tyranny by admin, and right now, the peasants aren't having it.

Amazon "MTD Boycott Starter Pack" Suggestions
(affiliate links – because resistance needs supplies)

• "Not Signing Up Until They Drag Me" Mug – morning motivation
• External Hard Drive – backup your records the old-fashioned way
• Noise-Cancelling Headphones – for ignoring HMRC webinars
• Shredder – for when the mandatory nudge letters start arriving
• Strong Black Coffee – fuel for the inevitable last-minute panic (if any)

Tax does have to be taxing. 

HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

The Costs of New MTD Rules Ignored by HMRC

 

HMRC has failed to do any assessment of the tax loss that will result from people quitting work as a result of the new MTD rules which require 5 tax returns a year. 

 If just 1% of self-employed taxpayers with turnovers above £20k cease working there will be a direct tax loss of £75m & an indirect loss - from VAT, indirect taxes, & knock-on effects on the wider economy - of another £150m. And that estimate excludes anyone from the top 10% of self-employed taxpayers.

Source 

There is an opt out if you claim religious beliefs prevent you from filing online. 

HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Pulling a Sickie - HMRC Days Off 2025

 

HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

HMRC's Quarterly Tax Return Torture: Why They're Forcing You to Submit More Than One Return a Year from April – And Why It's a Bloody Nightmare

Morning, you poor sods still reeling from the last self-assessment deadline, nursing your coffee while HMRC's hold music echoes in your nightmares. From 6 April 2026 (that's next month, folks), if your combined gross income from self-employment and/or property tops £50,000 (dropping to £30k in 2027 and £20k in 2028), HMRC is ditching the once-a-year Self Assessment bliss and shoving Making Tax Digital for Income Tax Self Assessment (MTD ITSA) down your throat. No more one annual return – instead, you'll be forced to keep digital records and submit quarterly updates to the taxman, plus an End of Period Statement and a final declaration by the usual 31 January deadline.

Why the hell are they doing this? HMRC spins it like it's Christmas come early: "modernisation", "better tax management", "real-time insights". Translation: they want your data more often, more accurately, and with less chance for you to "forget" a few quid here and there. Here's their official fairy tale:

• "Helps you stay on top of your tax affairs" – Quarterly updates give you a running view of your income/expenses so you can estimate your bill and avoid January heart attacks. (As if we didn't already know we're skint.)
• "Improves compliance and accuracy" – Digital records fed straight to HMRC mean fewer errors, less evasion, and more timely info for them to spot dodgy patterns early.
• "Supports business planning and growth" – Knowing your numbers quarterly supposedly makes you a better entrepreneur. (Bollocks – it just adds admin when you're already juggling invoices, clients, and life.)
• "Closes the tax gap" – More frequent peeks let HMRC nudge you (or fine you) sooner if something looks off, theoretically raising extra revenue (though their own estimates have been slashed from £6.3bn to £4.3bn while costs balloon to £1.4bn – classic HMRC efficiency).

The real reasons? Control and cash. Annual filings let you batch everything once a year – easy to miss a receipt or two, easy for HMRC to miss you in the backlog. Quarterly means you're feeding them cumulative summaries every three months (deadlines like 7 August, 7 November, etc., for tax-year quarters), giving them a live feed into your finances. It's the same logic as MTD for VAT: force digital, force frequency, force compliance – or face penalty points (two in two years = £200 fine, though new joiners get a soft landing on the first four misses).

But let's call it what it is: another layer of bureaucratic hell piled on the self-employed and landlords who already drown in red tape. HMRC can't answer phones on deadline day, takes years for refunds, issues phantom £2.8bn demands, and lets their own staff launder millions without jail – yet they've got the brass neck to demand four extra submissions a year from you, backed by compatible software (no more simple spreadsheets unless bridged), or face points and fines.

This isn't about helping you; it's about helping them squeeze more tax with less effort on their end. While you upload receipts and categorise expenses quarterly, their helplines stay jammed, their IT crashes, and their valuation army grows for the next mansion tax raid.

But turning your annual headache into a quarterly migraine while HMRC's own house remains a shambles? That's not modernisation – that's mandated misery, courtesy of the same clowns who can't organise a phone queue.

Amazon "Quarterly Submission Survival Kit" Suggestions
(affiliate links – because you'll need these for the four-times-a-year joy)

• Digital Receipt Scanner – turn paper into pixels before HMRC demands it
• Extra Monitor – for juggling software, spreadsheets, and rage tabs
• "I Submit Quarterly So HMRC Can Spy" Mug – ironic morning fuel
• Noise-Cancelling Headphones – drown out the portal crash screams
• Calendar & Reminder App – miss a deadline, miss your sanity

Tax does have to be taxing.

HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

A Wee Bit of Humour To Lighten The Mood

I bought a HM Revenue and Customs lanyard that I wear when I go to the barbers and car wash to see the panic on the workers' faces when I go in.

— Fesshole🧻 (@fesshole) March 5, 2026

HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"