Thursday 2 February 2012

Tax Avoidance Hypocrisy - The Ed Lester Debacle



As we all know, the government is skint. Therefore over the last year or so the government and its bureaucratic arm, HMRC, have been doing their best to promote the idea that tax avoidance (which, unlike tax evasion, is perfectly legal) is somehow akin to tax evasion and morally wrong, and have attempted to whip the media up into a moralistic crusade against avoidance.

In January this year Cameron said the following:

"I think we need a tougher approach and one of the things we’re going to be looking at this year is whether there’s going to be a more general anti-avoidance power that HMRC can use, particularly on very wealthy individuals."


This of course is rather hypocritical, given that many MPs sit on boards of companies that operate tax avoidance schemes.

Anyhoo, imagine my amusement last night when coming home from the pub and settling down to watch Newsnight only to discover that the government and HMRC have happily signed off on a tax avoidance scheme.

Ed Lester, the CEO of the Student Loans Company, is happily receiving his £182K per annum without deductions for tax or National Insurance.

How?

He is using a tax avoidance scheme, whereby his pay is is transferred gross to his private service company, which has been signed off by HMRC!

This is the same HMRC that has been bleating that tax avoidance is somehow morally wrong!

In classic damage limitation mode, feigning surprise and shock, Danny "Beaker" Alexander has ordered an inquiry. Rather pointless given that the state signed off on this deal, ie the state knows about it.

Beaker claims that he was "not made aware" of the potential tax benefits to Mr Lester when he approved his appointment and salary levels.

Bollocks!

Mr Lester's deal was signed off by Universities Minister David Willetts and was passed to the Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Beaker Alexander for approval because his salary was above the prime minister's pay.


By the way, those in government and HMRC who are claiming that this is a one off had better take a stress pill or two, there will be others outed in the coming days who also have a similar arrangement.

Hypocrisy from the state and its bureaucratic arm (HMRC), who would have thought it?

Therefore, despite the bleating by HMRC and the anti avoidance campaign pushed by the state and HMRC, have no qualms about using tax avoidance schemes; the fact that the government and HMRC signed this one off shows that they perfectly happy that people use them, they just don't have the guts to admit it.

UPDATE

In the fallout from this clusterfuck of hypocrisy, the government has just announced that Ed Lester will now have his tax deducted from his income at source!

Tax does have to be taxing.

UK EXPATS: Reduce tax on UK Pensions
HMRC QROPS provider. Unlock your UK pension and access a 25% lump sum today.

Quote ID code "ABC" when contacting a QROPS specialist.

Professional Cover Against the Threat of Costly TAX and VAT Investigations

What is TAXWISE?

TAXWISE is a tax-fee protection service that will pay up to £75,000 towards your accountant's fees in the event of an HM Revenue & Customs full enquiry or dispute.

To find out more, please use this link Taxwise



Tax Investigation for Dummies, by Nick Morgan, provides a good and easy to read guide for anyone caught up in an HMRC tax investigation. A must read for any Self Assessment taxpayer.

Click the link to read about: Tax Investigation for Dummies

HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

3 comments:

  1. This does not come under "tax evasion" or "tax avoidence", it's "tax efficiency" apparently.

    ReplyDelete
  2. My son is in his last year at university and then I will never again have to deal with the Student Loans Company, thank God. I have never seen such a useless and utterly incompetent pile of crap in my whole life.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I do not have any problem with somebody avoiding tax, as you have said many times, it is legal. However, this man is caught by the rules on personal service companies known as IR35. The indicative element for me is that there is clearly no right of substitution. I presume that he ticked the correct box on his self-assessment form in which case, especially since his situation has received so much this publicity, I would expect HMRC to investigate forthwith.

    ReplyDelete