Thursday 15 October 2015

Offshore Tax Evasion - A Question of Proof!

The Chartered Institute of Taxation says that the proposed £5K statutory minimum threshold of tax evaded, wrt offshore evasion, is not high enough to protect people in the more complex cases.

The threshold, set by HMRC, is meant to ensure that people who make errors over relatively small sums of tax do not receive a prison sentence of up to six months.

However, CIOT want the threshold to be raised to £25,000.

John Cullinane of CIOT is quoted by Contractor UK:
We are pleased to note that there will be a statutory defence of reasonable care.

This will be vital in limiting the scope of the offence.
But it would be a stronger safeguard for the taxpayer if the burden of proof was on HMRC to prove that reasonable care had not been taken, rather than being on the taxpayer to prove they took reasonable care.

We are also concerned that this proposal could be counterproductive for HMRC because the fear of prosecution, with no need to prove intention on HMRC’s part, could discourage taxpayers from coming forward voluntarily.”
As ever with HMRC, the concept of innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply!

Tax does have to be taxing.

Professional Cover Against the Threat of Costly TAX and VAT Investigations

Insurance to protect you against the cost of enquiry or dispute with HMRC is available from several sources including Solar Tax Investigation Insurance.

Ken Frost has negotiated a 10% discount on any polices that may suit your needs.

However, neither Ken Frost nor HMRCISSHITE either endorses or recommends their services.

What is Solar Tax Investigation Insurance?

Solar Tax Investigation Insurance is a tax-fee protection service that will pay up to £75,000 towards your accountant's fees in the event of an HM Revenue & Customs full enquiry or dispute.

To find out more, please use this link Solar Tax Investigation Insurance



HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

2 comments:

  1. Perhaps a perusal of the Bar Council paper on the same topic would prove enlightening M'Lud, it might illustrate the concerns that illustrious members of the bar have about the legislation and its application?

    http://www.barcouncil.org.uk/media/309863/bar_council_response_to_hmrc_consultation_on_tackling_offshore_tax_evasion-a_new_criminal_offence_response_17.10.14.pdf

    Of course, the drafters of the legislation will have taken 'reasonable care' to ensure that the burden of proof has not shifted merely because HMRC and/or CPS are incapable of putting a decent case together wrt offshore tax evasion?

    LOL

    ReplyDelete