Monday 6 January 2020

HMRC's Dodgy Pension Records


HMRC has vowed to overhaul how it deals with taxpayers investigating unexplained gaps in their state pension records following one woman’s 10-month battle to correct hers.

Lyndsey Jones, an FT journalist, noticed a missing year in her national insurance record when she checked her state pension forecast a year ago as part of her long-term retirement planning.

The gap left her one year short of the 35 years of qualifying contributions needed to get the full amount. Ms Jones disputed the gap, which dated back to 1988-89, when she was employed full-time as a reporter on the Egham Informer newspaper in Surrey.

However, HMRC could not find records for the disputed year, and said Ms Jones would have to provide evidence that the contributions were made on her behalf by producing payslips, P60s or bank statements from 30 years ago.

After Ms Jones lodged a formal complaint in October, HMRC contacted her to say it had traced the missing NI contributions and would be reviewing its training and working practices as a result.

HMRC told Ms Jones that the problem arose because the missing records had been kept on microfilm which had not been uncovered in previous searches.

HMRC is quoited by the FT:
We are glad that we have been able to help Ms Jones achieve the right outcome. While most customers’ national insurance records will be correct, this demonstrates the value of the government service Check Your State Pension that enables customers to check their individual records and resolve any inaccuracies. 

It was only as further information came to light, as a result of our continued engagement with Ms Jones, that we were able to identify the specific errors in the employer’s payroll returns which had prevented Ms Jones’ contributions being allocated to her national insurance record. 

Tracing missing records can be complex and span decades; there may also be errors made by employers that can delay our usual processes. This means the time to trace records can vary. 

We continuously strive to improve the support we can offer our customers and welcome the opportunity to receive any feedback to enable us to inform this process.” 
 Sir Steve Webb, director of policy with Royal London and a former pensions minister, said the case was “shocking” and should trigger a wider review.
It is shocking that members of the public have to do battle with HMRC to get what is rightfully theirs.

It is hard to believe that this is an isolated case. HMRC should be proactively reviewing cases where they have been alerted to potential problems with NI records as well as understanding more systematically how these errors have arisen in the first place.
Check your pension herehttps://www.gov.uk/check-state-pension

Tax does have to be taxing.

Professional Cover Against the Threat of Costly TAX and VAT Investigations

Insurance to protect you against the cost of enquiry or dispute with HMRC is available from several sources including Solar Tax Investigation Insurance.

Ken Frost has negotiated a 10% discount on any polices that may suit your needs.

However, neither Ken Frost nor HMRCISSHITE either endorses or recommends their services.

What is Solar Tax Investigation Insurance?

Solar Tax Investigation Insurance is a tax-fee protection service that will pay up to £75,000 towards your accountant's fees in the event of an HM Revenue & Customs full enquiry or dispute.

To find out more, please use this link Solar Tax Investigation Insurance



HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

2 comments:

  1. If she did have the original documents. Sending them in to the HMRC is almost a guarantee of them getting 'lost' in some post mountain black hole - never to be seen again.

    With regard to 'proactively reviewing cases', they need staff to do that which HMRC no longer has. Ideally, ones that know what they are doing. Career box tickers only i'm afraid. No Room At The Inn here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Simply not fucking true you wanker!
      Post sent to HMRC goes to a 3rd party scanning company & if deemed important will be returned

      Delete