Monday, 22 December 2025

Fujitsu Finally Gets the Boot: HMRC Dumps Scandal-Hit Giant for Netcompany on Trading Service



Morning, you tax-weary warriors. After what feels like an eternity of watching HMRC throw good money after bad into the black hole that is Fujitsu, the penny has finally dropped. Or rather, the contract has been ripped up.

The troubled Japanese IT behemoth – the very same outfit whose Horizon system wrongfully convicted hundreds of sub-postmasters and turned their lives into living nightmares – has been unceremoniously replaced by Danish firm Netcompany on HMRC’s vital Trading Service platform. That’s right: the system that handles the bulk of our import/export declarations, VAT on goods moving in and out, and a chunk of the customs revenue that keeps the lights on in Whitehall.

Fujitsu’s contract? Terminated. Netcompany steps in from 2026, with the transition already under way. HMRC says it’s part of a “strategic shift” to modernise and “reduce reliance on single suppliers”. Translation: “We’ve finally realised that sticking with a company whose software ruined thousands of innocent lives might not be the best look, especially when the Public Accounts Committee keeps asking awkward questions.”

Let’s be brutally honest: Fujitsu should have been shown the door years ago. The Horizon scandal alone – where faulty software led to prosecutions, bankruptcies, suicides, and a £1.3 billion compensation bill (so far) – should have been enough to blacklist them from any government contract. But no. HMRC kept the cheques rolling, pouring hundreds of millions into Fujitsu’s pockets while the rest of us dealt with glitchy online services and endless helpline holds.

This isn’t just a technical switch; it’s a long-overdue admission that outsourcing critical tax and customs systems to a firm with that track record was, frankly, insane. And the timing? Delicious. With the Post Office Horizon Inquiry still exposing fresh horrors almost weekly, HMRC quietly slipping Fujitsu out the back door is about as subtle as a bailiff at dawn.

Netcompany, for what it’s worth, comes with a cleaner slate and a reputation for delivering digital services on time and on budget (in Denmark, at least). Whether they can untangle the spaghetti of HMRC’s legacy systems remains to be seen, but at least they’re not carrying the baggage of wrongful convictions and cover-ups.

So, farewell Fujitsu – don’t let the door hit you on the way out. And good riddance to one of the most expensive, scandal-ridden outsourcing relationships in British public sector history.

Tax does have to be taxing.
But paying a fortune to a company that helped destroy lives? That’s just taking the piss.

Amazon “Celebrate the Fujitsu Exit” Suggestions
(affiliate links – because every small victory deserves a treat)

 

HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

24 comments:

  1. Fabulous news if you're uber-wealthy, with endless appeals and an army of tax lawyers at your disposal it'll be a decade before that brown envelope drops.

    If you're a parent and HMRC start taking your child benefit all you get is crocodile tears and hollow apologies.

    https://www.thetimes.com/uk/crime/article/tax-evasion-cases-hmrc-xh2qp88js

    ReplyDelete
  2. Completely agree. The thing is, HMRC is an organisation that was well aligned with Fukitsu. HMRC through various incompetence, negligence, misconduct and corruption have themselves ruined the lives of too many taxpayers and dedicated staff. They don't value human life. They're more concerned with 'how it looks' than actually trying to do the right thing. In other words, HMRC are the very definitions of: scumbags.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @14:35. On what basis do you claim that "they don't value human life".
      Yet another hyperbolic load of rowlocks.

      Delete
    2. If they value human life they wouldn't have caused so many mental health breakdowns and, in tragic cases, suicides.

      Delete
  3. No explanation necessary. Lies, damned lies and statistics, only these figures don't.

    558 years long suffering punters have been left hanging on the blower.

    HMRC will spin it as there's been improvement.

    https://www.accountancytoday.co.uk/2025/12/26/hmrc-call-waits-fall-but-taxpayers-still-face-558-years-on-hold/

    ReplyDelete
  4. Even after all the harm both Fujitsu and HMRC have caused people, there are clearly some people trying to deflect and 'defend' them. Worse still, they're not even paid to do so 🤣🤣 please sir, can I have some more 🤣🤣🤣

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @07:42. You mean some people have a different opinion than yourself. This must be deeply shocking for you.
      I pray that you seek counselling.

      Delete
    2. It's a weird phonemon that there are a few ex HMRC workers who, having failed to ever climb above E1/AO grade, spend the rest of their days begging for their former superiors to throw them a scrap of recognition. A very sad state of affairs. With so many mentally nuts people in their employment, it's no surprise that HMRC is sinking so badly: it's rotten from bottom to top.

      Delete
    3. A weird phonemon indeed.
      What I don't understand is how HMRC managers would throw a "scrap of recognition" to anonymous former employees. Or what form that "scrap of recognition" would take.
      Please enlighten us all.

      Delete
    4. That's possibly a question to ask your therapist...Sigmund Freud had some insightful ideas on such psychology...

      Delete
    5. @27 December 2025 at 20:14
      You're referring to those former staff who lead very sad, empty lives and hope that by licking the boots of their old bosses, they may somehow get the attention they never received during their lowly careers.
      On the other hand, some of us made it to HO (formerly C2) before embarking on a new career in accountancy, where we earn more than treble our old salary and get to regularly defeat the wooden tops at HMRC

      Delete
    6. @16:14. So you can't answer the question.
      Hardly surprising from someone who posts meaningless word salads.

      Delete
    7. @10:48/10:50
      Eh, what you dribbling on about? I didn't post the original comment. Was just trying to help by pointing you in the right direction.

      Delete
    8. @21:18. Interesting that you're now claiming that anyone who questions a majority view on here must be a former low grade employee of HMRC. The previous prevalent viewpoint was that this site was being monitored by senior management in the department. I guess that Excom must have better things to do these days.
      As for why people with unsuccessful careers in the department would want to support it in retirement, the mind simply boggles. But I guess that as a brilliant multi-millionaire accountant you were too busy to think that one through.

      Delete
    9. @10:58. No you weren't. You were trying to be a clever dick.
      And failed miserably.

      Delete
    10. @11:02 Don't be jealous...if you'd have unskilled and then taken the risk of setting up your own business you could have earned more than the £20K a year you collected from HMRC

      Delete
    11. Ooohh I detect a green eyed monster inside the failed hmrc clerical worker 🤣🤣🤣

      Delete
    12. @13:32 you've hit the nail on the head. When I worked at hmrc it was always the case that the best quality staff moved on and the dead wood sat it out until retirement, jealous and embittered about those who make something of their lives. Sadly their mindset affected how they treat taxpayers.

      Delete
    13. Thank goodness that 99.9% of the nation's revenue is paid in full and on time by taxpayers, meaning HMRC are largely irrelevant.

      We can't rely on HMRC employees. All the jealously, bitterness and bullying in tax offices must make it impossible to do a proper day's work.

      Delete
    14. @12:04. Would I really have increased my income by becoming unskilled?
      On a more serious note, thanks to you and @13:32. It's been a while since we had a good old-fashioned pile-on here. You've provided us all with a good laugh for the holiday season.


      Delete
    15. @22:21 "We can't rely on HMRC employees" Lol. Why would you want to "rely" on them? The average HMRC worker has the moral compass of a slimeball!!

      Delete
  5. @13:32. I never worked in a clerical grade in HMRC. As usual you talk absolute rowlocks.

    ReplyDelete
  6. @22:21. Yet again total rowlocks. In the financial year to 2025 HMRC interventions brought in revenue of £48 billion. The cost of running the department was £6.5 billion.
    A 'profit' of £41.5 billion.
    Not too shabby.
    No wonder Nige and Reform want to privatise the civil service.

    ReplyDelete