A loyal reader (who runs a small business) advises me that last week he got a letter from HMRC claiming that he had missed PAYE and NIC payments for the period 6th April to 5th May 2010.
Fair enough, except that he pays these quarterly and the amounts were not yet due for that particularly quarter.
On calling HMRC using the number given on the letter he was told "it's because of the new penalty rules, this letter has gone out to all quarterly payers".
He was told to phone another number to get the fact he was a quarterly payer recorded properly.
He rang the number, and was told that it was the wrong number; a new number was given to him.
The new number given, when called, gave a recorded message "this number is currently unavailable".
Several days of fruitless ringing, and he then re rang the first number (the one on the letter).
This time the call centre operative was able/willing to update the records there and then!
Have other quarterly PAYE/NIC payers had to endure the same time wasting "game of hide and seek" enforced on them by HMRC?
Tax does have to be taxing.
Professional Cover Against the Threat of Costly TAX and VAT Investigations
What is TAXWISE?
TAXWISE is a tax-fee protection service that will pay up to £75,000 towards your accountant's fees in the event of an HM Revenue & Customs full enquiry or dispute.
To find out more, please use this link Taxwise
Tax Investigation for Dummies, by Nick Morgan, provides a good and easy to read guide for anyone caught up in an HMRC tax investigation. A must read for any Self Assessment taxpayer.
Click the link to read about: Tax Investigation for Dummies
HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"
Claim for the time wasted at your normal hourly rate under misc.
ReplyDeleteThat's no way to treat your "customers"
ReplyDeleteHe rang the number, and was told that it was the wrong number; a new number was given to him.
ReplyDelete.......
Several days of fruitless ringing, and he then re rang the first number (the one on the letter).
This time the call centre operative was able/willing to update the records there and then!
Chances are, the first time he rang the number, he got through to someone who was unable to access his NIC records (it's pretty uncommon for people outside Longbenton to be able to access these).
The next time he rang, he got through to someone in Longbenton or an associated contact centre as all the numbers have gone 'virtual'.
You will find that because of the security episode a few years ago, all HMRC staff have various accesses to different systems that the person sitting next to them may not have access to especially as everyone's job being changed every five seconds.
He rang the number, and was told that it was the wrong number; a new number was given to him.
ReplyDelete.......
Several days of fruitless ringing, and he then re rang the first number (the one on the letter).
This time the call centre operative was able/willing to update the records there and then!
Chances are, the first time he rang the number, he got through to someone who was unable to access his NIC records (it's pretty uncommon for people outside Longbenton to be able to access these).
The next time he rang, he got through to someone in Longbenton or an associated contact centre as all the numbers have gone 'virtual'.
You will find that because of the security episode a few years ago, all HMRC staff have various accesses to different systems that the person sitting next to them may not have access to especially as everyone's job being changed every five seconds.