Thursday, 6 October 2011

HMRC Changes The Lexicon



My thanks to a loyal reader who pointed me towards a small and quiet corner of the HMRC website that explains HMRC's powers to prevent deliberate non payment of PAYE.

As from 6 April 2012 "HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) will be able to ask employers to pay a security where there is serious risk that they won’t pay over their PAYE tax deductions or Class 1 National Insurance contributions (NICs). "

The concept is valid when applied to criminals who withhold PAYE from employees pay packets, and who then run off and nick it without passing it onto HMRC.

However, within HMRC's explanatory notes (which try to reassure people that these new powers will not be misused) there comes HMRC's definition of Phoenixism:


"Where a business evades tax by becoming insolvent and then sets up a new company the next day to continue trading."

Reasonable?

Well not entirely, here is a more precise definition:

"In some cases the Liquidator is requested to sell the assets of the business to another party, including the former directors or shareholders. This is commonly known as a Phoenix."

Phoenixism, where the law is followed, is perfectly legal viz:


"The directors of the insolvent company will call an extraordinary general meeting and a meeting of creditors. An advertisement is placed in the London Gazette and creditors are written to with a request that they submit a claim for their debts. At the members meeting, the directors will report that the company is insolvent and will advise that the company should enter Liquidation voluntarily and pass a resolution to cease trading and appoint a Liquidator. At the subsequent creditors meeting, the directors place the statement of affairs before the creditors who then confirm the appointment of a Liquidator.

The Liquidator has four main tasks:

1. To realise the assets of the business
2. To adjudicate creditors' claims, where appropriate
3. To investigate and report on the conduct of directors
4. To make payments to creditors (eg HMRC) in order of priority
."

However, HMRC by subtly redefining the meaning by linking it to evasion (which is illegal) are implying that it is illegal. In fact they also imply that "insolvency" is a deliberate attempt at evasion, which of course may be true in some cases but is most certainly not true in all cases of insolvency.

I wonder why no one has picked this up until now?


Tax does have to be taxing.

UK EXPATS: Reduce tax on UK Pensions
HMRC QROPS provider. Unlock your UK pension and access a 25% lump sum today.

Quote ID code "ABC" when contacting a QROPS specialist.

Professional Cover Against the Threat of Costly TAX and VAT Investigations

What is TAXWISE?

TAXWISE is a tax-fee protection service that will pay up to £75,000 towards your accountant's fees in the event of an HM Revenue & Customs full enquiry or dispute.

To find out more, please use this link Taxwise

Tax Investigation for Dummies, by Nick Morgan, provides a good and easy to read guide for anyone caught up in an HMRC tax investigation. A must read for any Self Assessment taxpayer.

Click the link to read about: Tax Investigation for Dummies

HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

3 comments:

  1. "I wonder why no one has picked this up until now?"

    Err, perhaps because it's so obscure that only a seasoned conspiracy theorist would bother.

    I agree that the bullet is a bit sloppily worded. Using the word "setting" rather than "sets" would have made it clearer that the problem is not liquidation per se but the series of steps of which liquidation is a part. If I'd written it I might also have been tempted to take the word "evasion" out of that bullet as well, but only for the sake of being absolutely accurate while at the same time keeping it relatively simple; pheonix scams normally involve other fiddles in addition to the 2 steps mentioned.

    However, to suggest that such a minor linguistic ambiguity makes the statement unreasonable, or some kind of deliberate attempt to imply that the liquidation of a company is in all cases an attempt at evasion, seems to me to be quite a leap.

    Stew G

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thought for all...

    "Historical amnesia is a dangerous phenomenon, not only because it undermines morale and intellectual integrity, but also because it lays the groundwork for crimes that lie ahead."
    Naom Chomsky

    ReplyDelete
  3. sorry fella but this 'security' has been going on for years under VAT. Whilst legal, the act of doing a Pheonix (in order to effectively walk away from your debts) is hardly moral and has been carried out in order to do just that. The security keeps those who genuinelly fall foul, on the straight and narrow

    ReplyDelete