HMRC’s £8,000 Blunder: A Decades-Late Apology to Women

HMRC has once again proven its knack for monumental incompetence, this time leaving thousands of women shortchanged for decades due to a "historical error" that’s only now coming to light. The blunder, which primarily affected women who gave birth in the 1980s and 1990s, has resulted in a collective compensation bill of £7,859 per affected individual—a payout that, while welcome, is a stinging reminder of HMRC’s chronic mismanagement and indifference to taxpayers’ lives.

 

Let’s unpack this fiasco. When HMRC was supposedly overseeing the nation’s tax system with the diligence of a hawk, thousands of women were systematically underpaid or denied tax relief they were entitled to. The error, rooted in the labyrinthine complexity of tax codes and HMRC’s apparent inability to administer them properly, went unnoticed—or, more likely, ignored—for decades. These women, many of whom were juggling motherhood and financial pressures in the 80s and 90s, were left to bear the brunt of HMRC’s negligence. And now, in 2025, HMRC has the audacity to pat itself on the back for “discovering” this mistake, as if stumbling upon a multi-million-pound error is some kind of administrative triumph.

 

The compensation—£7,859 per woman—might sound like a generous windfall, but let’s not kid ourselves. This isn’t HMRC’s benevolence at work; it’s a belated attempt to clean up a mess of their own making. Adjusted for inflation, the value of the money these women were owed decades ago would likely dwarf the current payout. A quick calculation using the Bank of England’s inflation calculator shows that £7,859 in 2025 is worth far less in real terms than it would have been in, say, 1990—when £3,000 (a conservative estimate of the original underpayment) would equate to over £9,000 today. HMRC’s “generous” payout doesn’t even begin to cover the lost earning potential, interest, or financial strain these women endured over the years.

 

And what of the human cost? These women, many now in their 50s or 60s, were deprived of funds during critical years—money that could have eased the burden of childcare, mortgages, or simply putting food on the table. HMRC’s error wasn’t just a clerical oversight; it was a betrayal of trust that compounded the financial insecurity of thousands of families. The tax authority’s response? A sterile letter in the post, as if a cold bureaucratic note can erase decades of hardship. No public apology, no urgent commitment to overhaul their error-prone systems—just a perfunctory payout and a hope that the issue fades from the headlines.

 

This isn’t HMRC’s first rodeo. From the Waspi women’s pension scandal to the ongoing Child Benefit overpayment debacles, HMRC has a track record of failing the very people it’s meant to serve. The organisation’s labyrinthine processes and apparent aversion to accountability have left taxpayers navigating a minefield of errors, with HMRC seemingly content to “discover” mistakes only when forced to confront them. The fact that this particular error lay dormant for over 30 years raises serious questions: How many other systemic failures are lurking in HMRC’s archives? How many more taxpayers are unknowingly owed money? And why does it take decades for HMRC to notice its own incompetence?

 

The timing of this revelation is particularly galling. As the cost-of-living crisis continues to bite, HMRC’s belated payout feels like a cruel irony—a lump sum that arrives too late to help these women when they needed it most. And let’s not forget the administrative cost of this cleanup. HMRC will likely spend millions identifying and contacting affected women, processing payments, and defending itself against inevitable criticism. That’s taxpayer money—our money—being used to fix a problem HMRC created in the first place.

 

To add insult to injury, HMRC’s announcement carries an air of self-congratulation, as if issuing these letters is some noble act of restitution. In reality, it’s the bare minimum, and it’s decades overdue. The women affected deserve more than a cheque and a form letter; they deserve a public apology, transparency about how this error occurred, and assurances that HMRC is taking concrete steps to prevent similar failures. Instead, we’re left with the same old story: an underfunded, overstretched tax authority bumbling through its responsibilities, leaving ordinary people to pick up the pieces.

 

This scandal is a stark reminder that HMRC is not fit for purpose in its current form. It’s a bloated bureaucracy that prioritises compliance over competence, leaving taxpayers to suffer the consequences of its failures. The £7,859 payout may be a lifeline for some, but it’s a drop in the bucket compared to the trust HMRC has squandered. If the government wants to restore faith in the tax system, it needs to hold HMRC accountable, streamline its operations, and ensure that errors like this are caught in months, not decades. Until then, this payout is less a victory than a grim acknowledgment of HMRC’s enduring legacy of letting down the people it’s meant to serve.

 

Tax does have to be taxing. 

HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"