HMRC Car Tax Update: Drivers Slammed with 400% Hike in Costs as Thousands Face 'Unaffordable' Charges

In a move that's sparking outrage across the UK, HMRC's latest car tax update has hit drivers hard, with some facing a staggering 400% increase in costs. Implemented in April 2025, this change targets double-cab pick-up trucks, reclassifying them from commercial vehicles to cars for tax purposes. The result? Thousands of motorists, including farmers, tradespeople, and everyday drivers, are now burdened with "unaffordable" charges that could add hundreds or even thousands of pounds to their annual bills. If you're searching for details on the HMRC car tax hike 2025 or VED road tax increases, read on to uncover why this policy is being labelled as a brutal attack on working Brits.

What Exactly is the HMRC Car Tax Update Causing This 400% Hike?

The controversy stems from HMRC's decision to eliminate a long-standing tax loophole for double-cab pick-up trucks. Previously, these versatile vehicles—think models like the Ford Ranger or Toyota Hilux—were treated as light goods vehicles, qualifying for a flat-rate Benefit-in-Kind (BiK) tax of around £3,960 per year for company car users. But as of April 2025, HMRC has reclassified them as cars, subjecting them to BiK rates based on CO2 emissions and list price.

This shift means drivers could see their tax bills skyrocket by up to 400%, with some facing annual charges exceeding £15,000. For higher-rate taxpayers, the effective cost could be even more punishing. HMRC claims the change closes a "tax advantage" exploited by non-commercial users, but critics argue it's a stealth tax grab that ignores the practical needs of those who rely on these vehicles for work.

Adding insult to injury, this isn't an isolated tweak. The 2025/26 Vehicle Excise Duty (VED) rates have seen broad increases across the board. First-year road tax for high-emission cars has doubled in some bands, and even electric vehicle (EV) owners are now paying VED for the first time, ending their zero-tax exemption. Luxury cars over £40,000 face an additional £410 surcharge, a threshold that's increasingly catching mid-range models as prices rise.

How the 400% Car Tax Hike is Hammering Thousands of UK Drivers

Imagine you're a self-employed builder or a rural farmer who depends on a double-cab pick-up for hauling tools and equipment. Under the old rules, your tax was manageable—a fixed amount that didn't fluctuate wildly. Now, with the HMRC car tax update, you're lumped in with luxury sedan owners, paying BiK based on emissions that these rugged trucks naturally produce in higher amounts.

- Cost Breakdown: For a typical double-cab like the Ford Ranger (emitting around 200g/km CO2), the BiK rate jumps to 37% of the vehicle's value. At a £40,000 list price, that's a taxable benefit of £14,800—over 370% more than before. For 40% taxpayers, this translates to an extra £5,920 in income tax annually.  

- Who’s Hit Hardest?: Tradespeople, agricultural workers, and small business owners make up the bulk of affected drivers. Estimates suggest thousands are impacted, with many calling the charges "unaffordable" amid rising fuel costs and inflation.

- Broader Ripple Effects: Even non-company car users face higher VED rates. Standard rates for petrol and diesel cars rose to £190 in April 2025, while plug-in hybrids (PHEVs) see company car tax perks eroded starting this year.

This isn't just about numbers—it's about livelihoods. Online forums are ablaze with frustration, with Reddit users decrying the changes as "anti-motorist" and questioning how families can afford to keep their vehicles on the road.

Why HMRC Deserves to Be Eviscerated for This Disastrous Policy

Let's not mince words: HMRC's car tax update is a tone-deaf, revenue-hungry assault on ordinary drivers. While the government touts it as "fairness," it's anything but. By reclassifying double-cab pick-ups without adequate transition periods or exemptions for genuine commercial use, HMRC is punishing those who need these vehicles most. It's a classic case of bureaucratic overreach, ignoring real-world realities in favour of filling Treasury coffers—expected to rake in an extra £400 million from VED hikes alone.

Critics, including motoring experts and driver advocacy groups, have slammed the move as shortsighted. "This 400% hike is unaffordable for thousands," echoes the sentiment from recent reports, highlighting how it exacerbates the cost-of-living crisis. And let's not forget the hypocrisy: As the UK pushes for net-zero, taxing EVs and hybrids more heavily sends mixed messages, deterring the shift to greener transport.

HMRC's track record isn't helping. From delayed refunds to confusing guidance on the new rules, drivers are left navigating a minefield of paperwork and penalties. If this is "simplifying" the tax system, as officials claim, then it's a failure on every level.

 The Bigger Picture: 2025 VED Road Tax Increases and What They Mean for You

This double-cab debacle is part of a wider wave of car tax changes in 2025:

| Vehicle Type | Key Change | Estimated Cost Increase | 

| Double-Cab Pick-Ups | Reclassified as cars for BiK | Up to 400% (e.g., £3,960 to £15,000+) | 

| High-Emission New Cars | First-year VED doubled | £2,000+ for >255g/km CO2 |

| Electric Vehicles | End of zero-tax exemption | £190 standard rate from year 2 |

| Luxury Cars (>£40k) | Surcharge extension to EVs | +£410 annually for 5 years |

| Plug-in Hybrids | Reduced BiK incentives | 2-5% rate increases phased in |

These hikes, effective from April 1, 2025, are indexed to inflation and CO2 bands, ensuring future pain for non-EV owners.

Time to Fight Back Against HMRC's Unfair Car Tax Hike

The HMRC car tax update isn't just a policy—it's a betrayal of drivers already squeezed by high fuel prices and insurance premiums. If you're affected by this 400% hike or the broader VED increases, don't stay silent. Contact your MP, join petitions, or explore tax-efficient alternatives like switching to compliant vans.

Tax does have to be taxing.



HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

HMRC's Woke Circus: How Taxpayer Cash Fuels a Festival of Futility While Services Collapse

In the labyrinthine halls of His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC), where one might expect diligent civil servants to be chasing down tax dodgers and ensuring the nation's coffers are filled, a far more insidious game is afoot. According to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request by the Taxpayers’ Alliance, unearthed by the ever-vigilant Guido Fawkes, no fewer than 119 HMRC staffers are permitted to fritter away 20% of their working hours on seven so-called "staff networks." These aren't networks dedicated to improving tax compliance or streamlining bureaucracy—no, they're a smorgasbord of identity politics playgroups: Carers, Disability, PRISM (LGBT+), Race, Religion or Belief, Sex and Gender, and Social Mobility. That's right, while the average Brit grapples with skyrocketing bills and a cost-of-living crisis, HMRC's pen-pushers are busy virtue-signalling their way through the workday.

Let's break down the absurdity. Each of these seven networks boasts a bloated hierarchy: one Network Chair, two Deputy Chairs, and a whopping 14 Regional Steering Group Members. Do the math—that's 17 leadership roles per network, multiplied by seven, equalling 119 cosseted positions. At 20% time allocation, this equates to 23.8 full-time equivalent (FTE) staff members doing anything but their actual jobs. And what are they up to? Recent events include gems like ‘Our Voices Matter’ (because apparently, the voices of overworked taxpayers don't), a ‘Multicultural Event in Portsmouth’ (sounds like a taxpayer-funded party), and ‘Dyslexia from a Cultural Perspective’ (as if dyslexia needed a DEI spin to be addressed). This isn't public service; it's a taxpayer-subsidised therapy session for the perpetually offended.

Now, let's talk money—because that's what HMRC is supposed to be good at handling, right? The median salary in the Civil Service, which includes HMRC staff, stands at £35,680 as of 2025. Crunch the numbers: 23.8 FTE multiplied by £35,680 comes to approximately £850,000 annually. That's nearly a million pounds of your hard-earned cash diverted from essential services to fund this ideological indulgence. And this is just the tip of the iceberg. Guido Fawkes also revealed that HMRC has ballooned its internal 'Equality and Diversity' team to 30 full-time staff, further bloating the bureaucracy with roles that seem designed to justify their own existence. Add in the untracked hours spent on these networks—HMRC admits it doesn't even bother monitoring them—and you're looking at a black hole of waste that could fund real priorities, like hiring more agents to process tax returns on time.

But the real scandal isn't just the squandered resources; it's the glaring hypocrisy. While HMRC staff lounge in these echo chambers of enlightenment, the agency's core performance is in freefall. In 2023–24, HMRC answered a pitiful 66.4% of customers' attempts to speak to an adviser, far below their 85% target, with average wait times exceeding 23 minutes. Complaints are piling up: In the first quarter of 2025, Tier 1 complaints saw a not-upheld rate hovering around 55%, while Tier 2 escalations revealed partial or full upholding in a significant chunk of cases. Taxpayers are left on hold, fuming, as their queries about self-assessments, VAT refunds, or child benefits go unanswered. Meanwhile, HMRC's latest performance update for April to June 2025 shows continued misses on key targets, with service levels dipping further amid what they euphemistically call "challenges." It's a damning indictment: As call queues stretch into oblivion and errors mount, these networks provide a convenient escape hatch for staff to avoid the drudgery of actual work.

This isn't an isolated folly; it's symptomatic of a deeper rot in Whitehall's woke obsession. Just last week, the Taxpayers’ Alliance highlighted HMRC's near-miss with an hour-long session titled 'The Guilt of Being British'—mercifully cancelled after public backlash, but emblematic of the self-flagellating nonsense infiltrating public institutions. How can an agency tasked with enforcing fiscal responsibility justify such frivolous distractions? In an era of record tax burdens—where the average worker toils until June just to pay off the government—HMRC's priorities are grotesquely misplaced. They're not collecting taxes; they're collecting grievances.

It's high time for a reckoning. Scrap these networks, redirect the staff back to their desks, and focus on what HMRC was created for: efficient tax administration, not endless navel-gazing. Taxpayers deserve better than to fund this circus of complacency. If HMRC won't clean house, perhaps the new government should—with an axe to the budget for such banalities. After all, the only "network" that matters is the one connecting hardworking Brits to a functional public service. Anything less is theft by another name.

Tax does have to be taxing.


HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

EDI Must DIE - HMRC's Diversity Delusions: Prioritising Pronouns Over Phone Lines

In a move that perfectly encapsulates the bloated, out-of-touch bureaucracy plaguing Britain's public sector, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) has quietly ballooned its Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) team to 30 staff members. This expansion, revealed through successive Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, shows a steady climb from 21 employees on January 1, 2024, to 25 by June 1, 2024, and now 30 as of July 11, 2025. Meanwhile, taxpayers desperate for basic assistance are left rotting on hold, with average wait times exceeding 23 minutes and only two-thirds of calls even being answered. If this isn't a glaring case of misplaced priorities, what is?

HMRC's official line on this EDI empire-building is as predictably vague as it is unconvincing: “HMRC is committed to reflecting diverse communities and being an inclusive and respectful place to work, in line with Civil Service values. This supports our delivery of strategic objectives and helps us to provide the best service for customers.” One can't help but wonder: how exactly does a larger EDI team translate to better tax collection or customer support? Perhaps they're devising diverse ways to ignore phone calls, or inclusive strategies for hanging up on frustrated callers. The query cheekily leaves it "up to co-conspirators to guess how," but let's speculate: maybe EDI workshops teach staff to apologise in multiple languages before disconnecting, or ensure that hold music represents a rainbow of cultural tunes. Whatever the rationale, it's clear that HMRC's commitment to "diversity" doesn't extend to diverse taxpayer needs—like, say, actually getting through on the phone.

This EDI obsession comes at a time when HMRC's customer service has plummeted to depths that would embarrass a third-world call centre. In the first 11 months of 2023-24, the average wait time to speak to an advisor was nearly 23 minutes, up from just five minutes in 2018-19. Only 66.4% of call attempts were answered, falling woefully short of the 85% target. Taxpayers collectively wasted 798 years on hold in 2022-23—more than double the time from 2019-20. And in a particularly cruel twist, over 44,000 callers were abruptly cut off after waiting 70 minutes in 2023-24, a 535% spike from the previous year. As one exasperated X user put it, "HMRC must burn," recounting how agents simply hang up when queries get too complex. Another highlighted language barriers, with staff unable to communicate clearly in English—ironic for an agency serving a predominantly English-speaking nation.

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) didn't mince words in its damning report, accusing HMRC of deliberately degrading phone services to force people online. PAC Chair Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown blasted the agency for eroding public trust, noting that digital alternatives aren't ready or suitable for everyone—seven million people can't even use them. HMRC's push to "digital-first" might sound modern, but it's a smokescreen for chronic underfunding and inefficiency. Years of Tory cuts left HMRC understaffed and demoralised, with inexperienced agents and outdated IT systems. Now, under Labour, the bloat continues: EDI teams grow while core functions atrophy. As Reform UK supporter Rupert Lowe demanded, the leadership should be sacked for showing "ZERO respect for the people paying their wages."

Let's not forget the bigger picture: HMRC's failures aren't just annoying—they're costly. Uncollected debts hit £46.8 billion in the 2023-24 tax gap, with £5 billion written off as unrecoverable. Fraud in schemes like R&D tax reliefs persists due to insufficient checks. Yet, resources are diverted to EDI navel-gazing, including seminars on the "guilt of being British"—held during office hours, no less. This isn't inclusion; it's indoctrination on the taxpayer's dime. As one X post fumed, "Bureaucrats taking our money & attacking our core values & nation."

HMRC claims recent improvements, like reducing wait times to 11 minutes and meeting some targets in late 2024. But scepticism abounds—complaints surged 65% last year, with £718,000 paid in compensation for delays. And with plans for a new contact platform in 2026-27 promising callbacks and wait estimates, why the foot-dragging? The National Audit Office (NAO) nailed it: HMRC's digital dreams haven't eased pressures, and service levels have been "far below" expectations for years.

It's time to eviscerate this nonsense. Slash the EDI bloat, hire competent staff who can answer phones in under an hour, and focus on collecting taxes rather than virtue-signalling. Taxpayers aren't "co-conspirators" in some woke agenda—they're the ones footing the bill for this farce. If HMRC can't pick up the phone, perhaps we should stop picking up the tab.

Tax does have to be taxing.



HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

HMRC’s Anti-British Training Courses: A Betrayal of Public Trust

In a shocking display of ideological overreach, His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC), the very institution tasked with upholding the financial backbone of the United Kingdom, has been caught peddling divisive and anti-British training courses to its staff. These courses, cloaked in the guise of progressive enlightenment, reportedly include sessions that promote feelings of “guilt” for being British and push narratives rooted in critical race theory and other controversial frameworks. This is not just a misstep—it’s a grotesque betrayal of the public’s trust and a dangerous precedent for a government body that should embody impartiality and national unity.

A Curriculum of Division

According to reports, including an exclusive by The Daily Mail, HMRC staff have been subjected to training that encourages them to grapple with the supposed “guilt of being British.” Such sessions allegedly delve into critical race theory, a framework that frames history and society through the lens of systemic oppression, often casting entire nations or ethnic groups as inherently culpable. For a taxpayer-funded institution like HMRC, whose role is to collect revenue and ensure compliance with tax law, to indulge in such ideological exercises is not only irrelevant but actively undermines its credibility.

Why is HMRC, an agency meant to focus on numbers, compliance, and economic efficiency, diverting resources to workshops that appear designed to shame employees for their national identity? The answer lies in a broader cultural malaise where public institutions are increasingly co-opted by activist agendas. These courses, far from fostering unity or improving workplace efficiency, sow division and resentment. They alienate employees who may feel targeted for their heritage while distracting from the core mission of tax collection—a mission that affects every citizen, regardless of their background.

The Public’s Money, Wasted

HMRC’s budget comes from the British taxpayer. Every pound spent on these training courses is a pound diverted from improving tax collection systems, combating fraud, or supporting public services like the NHS or schools. The irony is palpable: an agency responsible for fiscal responsibility is squandering resources on ideological indoctrination. Posts on X have highlighted public outrage at this misuse of funds, with sentiments echoing that HMRC should focus on its actual job rather than playing social engineer.

Consider the scale of HMRC’s operations. In 2022-23, the agency had only 397 specialists tackling profit shifting by multinational corporations, a critical issue costing the Treasury billions. Yet, instead of investing in more staff or better training to address complex financial crimes, HMRC is apparently prioritising sessions that lecture employees on “white privilege” or the supposed sins of British history. This is not just a misallocation of resources; it’s a deliberate choice to prioritise ideology over efficacy.

Undermining National Cohesion

The United Kingdom is a diverse nation, built on a shared sense of identity and purpose. For a government body to promote narratives that frame Britishness as something to be ashamed of is not only divisive but dangerous. It erodes the social contract that binds citizens to their institutions. When HMRC staff are taught to view their country through a lens of guilt, how can they be expected to serve its people with impartiality? The risk is that such training fosters a culture of self-loathing within the civil service, which could translate into biased decision-making or policies that unfairly target certain groups.

This is not an isolated incident. Similar concerns have been raised about other government departments, such as the Home Office, where critical race theory classes have reportedly been conducted. The pattern suggests a troubling trend: unelected bureaucrats are using their positions to push ideological agendas that have little to no public mandate. The British public did not vote for their tax agency to become a classroom for radical social theories—they expect it to collect taxes fairly and efficiently.

A Lack of Accountability

What makes this scandal even more egregious is the lack of transparency and accountability. HMRC has not publicly defended these courses or provided a clear rationale for their inclusion in staff training. The absence of open dialogue fuels suspicion that these programs are being implemented under the radar, shielded from public scrutiny. When whistleblowers and media outlets like The Daily Mail expose such practices, the response is often silence or deflection rather than an honest reckoning.

The government must hold HMRC to account. If these courses are deemed essential, then let them be debated openly in Parliament. Let the public see the curriculum, the costs, and the justification. If, as critics suspect, these sessions are little more than ideological posturing, then they should be scrapped immediately. The civil service is not a playground for activists—it exists to serve the public, not to lecture them on their supposed moral failings.

The Bigger Picture

HMRC’s flirtation with anti-British training is symptomatic of a broader cultural shift within public institutions. Across the Western world, government agencies are increasingly adopting frameworks that prioritise identity politics over merit, unity, and competence. In the UK, this trend is particularly jarring given the nation’s history of resilience and pragmatism. The British people have faced wars, economic hardship, and social change with a stoic commitment to fairness and common sense. They deserve a tax agency that reflects those values, not one that undermines them.

The public reaction on platforms like X underscores the growing frustration with this kind of institutional overreach. Users have called out the absurdity of spending taxpayer money on “woke” initiatives while core services struggle. The sentiment is clear: the British public wants their institutions to focus on delivering results, not preaching ideology.

A Call to Action

HMRC must immediately cease these anti-British training courses and conduct a full audit of its training programs. Every pound spent on ideological workshops should be redirected to hiring more tax specialists, improving digital infrastructure, or cracking down on tax evasion. The agency must also commit to transparency, publishing the content and cost of all training programs for public review.

The British people deserve better than a tax agency that uses their money to fund divisive, anti-national rhetoric. HMRC’s role is to serve the public, not to lecture its employees on the supposed evils of their country’s history. It’s time for HMRC to get back to basics: collect taxes, fight fraud, and leave the social engineering to others. Anything less is a betrayal of the trust placed in them by the British people. 

 

Tax does have to be taxing.


HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Juniors Fucked Up IHT

 

REVEALED: Entire HMRC Inheritance Tax Analysis Team Is Fewer Than Five ‘Junior Officials' https://t.co/NHN8xYalue pic.twitter.com/Fj5uOb5NZQ

— Guido Fawkes (@GuidoFawkes) August 1, 2025

Tax does have to be taxing.



HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"