YOUR TAX RECORDS ARE PRIVATE. SO WHY IS THE GOVERNMENT OPENING THE DOOR TO ENERGY COMPANIES?
Your electricity supplier wants to know what you earn. The Government holds your tax records. And now the boundaries between the two are being redrawn.
There was a time when the relationship between you and your energy supplier was straightforward.
You used electricity and gas. They sent you a bill. You paid it.
Your energy company had no legitimate reason to know your annual income, your tax affairs, your pension arrangements or the financial details of your private life.
But apparently, those boundaries are now up for discussion.
The Government is pursuing arrangements for sharing information from public authorities, including HMRC, to help energy companies identify households for targeted support.
And this raises a fundamental question:
Whatever happened to the confidentiality of our tax records?
HMRC RECORDS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE PRIVATE. THAT IS THE LAW.
This is not simply about people feeling uncomfortable with their personal information being shared.
There is a very real legal principle at stake.
Under Section 18 of the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005, HMRC officials are subject to a statutory duty of confidentiality.
The legislation places restrictions on the disclosure of information held by HMRC. It recognises that taxpayers provide the Government with highly personal financial information on the understanding that it will be protected and only disclosed where there is lawful authority.
Section 19 also provides for criminal sanctions for wrongful disclosure of identifiable taxpayer information.
In other words, taxpayer confidentiality is not some optional courtesy. It is a fundamental part of the legal framework governing HMRC.
So why are we now contemplating arrangements that could allow information from these confidential government records to be used in connection with private energy companies?
Yes, legislation can create specific legal gateways for information sharing. But the existence of a legal gateway does not mean that every proposed use of confidential information should automatically be accepted without scrutiny.
The question is whether this expansion is necessary, proportionate and properly protected.
And the public deserves a proper explanation.
YOUR TAX AFFAIRS ARE NONE OF YOUR ENERGY COMPANY'S BUSINESS
Think about what HMRC knows about you.
Your income. Your employment. Your tax position. Information relating to benefits and other financial circumstances.
Now consider why an energy supplier should need access to information derived from those records.
You didn't give your energy company permission to become an investigator of your financial circumstances when you signed up for gas and electricity.
You didn't agree to have your personal finances become part of a corporate assessment exercise.
And you certainly didn't expect the information you provide to HMRC to potentially find its way into arrangements involving private energy businesses.
The Government may argue that this is about identifying vulnerable households and targeting financial assistance.
But a worthwhile objective does not remove the need for strict limits on the information being shared.
What exactly will companies receive? Will they see individual financial records or simply an indication of eligibility? Who will have access? How long will information be retained? What happens if it is inaccurate?
These are basic questions, not unreasonable demands.
YOUR HOUSE MAY BE WORTH A FORTUNE. THAT DOESN'T MEAN YOU ARE.
The inclusion of property valuation information raises another serious concern.
A property valuation tells us what a house might be worth. It does not tell us how much money its owner has in the bank.
Someone who bought a modest home 30 years ago may now own a property worth considerably more. But that doesn't mean they have a large pension, substantial savings or sufficient disposable income to absorb rising energy costs.
A home is not a cash machine.
A property valuation is not a measure of monthly affordability.
And the idea that someone's financial circumstances can be fairly assessed simply by looking at the estimated value of their home deserves considerable scrutiny.
What about pensioners? What about people on modest incomes? What about those who are asset-rich but cash-poor?
Will the system understand the difference between wealth on paper and money available to pay the bills?
WHERE DOES CONFIDENTIALITY END AND CORPORATE ACCESS BEGIN?
The wider concern is the gradual expansion of information sharing between government departments and private organisations.
HMRC holds information because it has a statutory responsibility to administer the tax system.
It is not a commercial database.
It is not a resource for businesses to exploit.
It contains information supplied by individuals who are legally required to provide accurate details of their financial affairs.
That relationship depends on confidentiality and public trust.
The Government itself acknowledges the importance of taxpayer confidentiality in its own published guidance.
So if the Government wants to expand the circumstances in which information can be disclosed, it must explain exactly why that is necessary and what safeguards will apply.
It is not enough to say that data sharing makes administration easier.
Convenience is not a sufficient justification for weakening important privacy boundaries.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE INFORMATION IS WRONG?
There is another problem that should not be overlooked.
Information held by government departments is not necessarily a complete or accurate picture of someone's current financial circumstances.
Records can be outdated. Circumstances change. Property valuations can be misleading. Income does not necessarily reflect disposable income.
If information is used to determine eligibility for energy support, or potentially to influence how households contribute towards a scheme, mistakes could have real financial consequences.
Who corrects those mistakes?
Who takes responsibility?
Will people know what information has been used to assess them?
And will they have a meaningful right to challenge decisions?
These questions must be answered before such arrangements become normalised.
THE GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO EXPLAIN ITSELF
The public deserves clear answers to some very straightforward questions:
Exactly what information will HMRC disclose?
Will energy companies receive identifiable individual tax information or only limited eligibility information?
What specific legal provisions authorise the disclosure?
Why is access to this information necessary?
Who within energy companies will be permitted to access it?
Will the information be stored, and for how long?
Can it be used for purposes other than administering the relevant support scheme?
What safeguards prevent onward sharing or misuse?
How can individuals find out what information has been shared about them?
What happens when the information is wrong?
Most importantly, why should people have to accept the expansion of corporate access to information they reasonably expect HMRC to keep confidential?
PRIVACY SHOULD NOT BE THE PRICE OF GETTING HELP WITH YOUR ENERGY BILL
Let's be absolutely clear.
Nobody is arguing against helping people who cannot afford to heat their homes.
Nobody is suggesting that vulnerable households should be abandoned.
But helping people and expanding access to their confidential financial information are two separate issues.
We can debate how energy support should be funded. We can debate eligibility. We can debate how best to identify households in need.
What we should not do is treat taxpayer confidentiality as an inconvenient obstacle to administrative efficiency.
HMRC's statutory duty of confidentiality exists for a reason. People should be able to provide information to the tax authorities without feeling that it could routinely become available to private businesses for purposes far removed from collecting tax.
There must be clear legal authority, strict limitations, meaningful oversight and genuine accountability.
Our tax records are private. Our financial circumstances are personal. And our homes are not open invitations for corporations to investigate our wealth.
The Government needs to remember that the information it holds does not belong to it in some unrestricted sense. It holds that information under specific legal responsibilities, including a duty to protect its confidentiality.
The public should not have to wonder whether paying their energy bill now comes with an expectation that their private financial lives are available for inspection.
If the Government believes these arrangements are justified, it should have no difficulty explaining them in full.
Because the public is entitled to ask one very simple question:
If HMRC is legally obliged to protect our tax information, why is the Government creating new routes for that information to be used by private energy companies?
And it deserves an answer.
This is a disaster waiting to happen, and waiting to be hacked!
HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"