Friday 5 February 2010

Hartnett Places HMRC Above The Law

Above The Law
Fresh from his junket to Washington, Dave Hartnett continues to believe that he bestrides the world like a colossus and that all should tremble before him.

His latest "battle against evil" will, seemingly, be waged against lawyers.

Hartnett is, as we know, fixated on the "evil" people who try to avoid tax (despite the fact that avoidance is not only legal, but logical).

Hartnett is extremely angry that lawyers are offering tax avoidance advice to clients. This advice is protected by legal privilege (ie HMRC can't get their hands on the lawyers' files, as they now can do with accountants).

Hartnett wants legal privilege to be overturned when it comes to HMRC. In other words, he wants to place HMRC above the law!

Quite an ambitious little civil servant isn't he?

Beware little men with big ambitions.

Why such evangelical zeal from a man who has, until the last few years, been absolutely invisible?

The answer is simple, some moons ago Hartnett butt kissed Brown and promised him that all his financial needs could be met if only HMRC were given more power. He gave Gordon a glimpse of a future overflowing with honey, derived from unlimited revenues harvested by HMRC's new powers.

The trouble is Hartnett's promises have not come to fruition. People are not prepared to kowtow and roll over to play dead to the government's desire to milk them dry, and are either leaving the country or ensuring that they pay as little tax as legally possible. Thus Hartnett is left looking rather foolish.

It the last act of a desperate man to try to place himself/his organisation above the law.

Hartnett should remember that legal professional privilege is a fundamental human and democratic right, and a cornerstone in the administration of justice. Tamper with that, and we move one step further forward towards dictatorship.

Hartnett though is more interested in saving his own skin, rather than preserving the rule of law or the rights of the British people.

Tax does have to be taxing.

Professional Cover Against the Threat of Costly TAX and VAT Investigations

What is TAXWISE?

TAXWISE is a tax-fee protection service that will pay up to £75,000 towards your accountant's fees in the event of an HM Revenue & Customs full enquiry or dispute.

To find out more, please use this link Taxwise

Tax Investigation for Dummies, by Nick Morgan, provides a good and easy to read guide for anyone caught up in an HMRC tax investigation. A must read for any Self Assessment taxpayer.

Click the link to read about: Tax Investigation for Dummies

HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

7 comments:

  1. Hartnett should spend more time tackling MP who flip (to avoid tax) before going after the general public.

    ReplyDelete
  2. how about they just repeal the loopholes for next year.

    Lets not criminalise the people following current rules and actually admit we can't afford to let the loopholes or deductions exist anymore.

    can we please get a group of politicians and government managers who actually get to the point and don't hide the truth?

    ReplyDelete
  3. can we please get a group of politicians and government managers who actually get to the point and don't hide the truth?

    I would vote for the Smurfs and Wombles!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I’m only posting in this story as it’s at the top of the page.

    Ken, perhaps you could ask HMRC to publish the results of their latest staff survey. I don’t think it would take you too long to work out what the general feeling towards the department is but it would be nice to see it in the public domain all the same…

    ReplyDelete
  5. I do not think they will be rushing to publish the staff survey results.

    Sixth survey yet that highlights a big problem with bullying and harassment within HMRC.

    12% Yes,
    10% prefer not to say (not sure how that cannot be taken as more yes's)
    78% No

    ReplyDelete

  6. 12% Yes,
    10% prefer not to say (not sure how that cannot be taken as more yes's)
    78% No


    My apologies, I got the figures wrong. The ones I posted refer to 'Discrimination'.

    The bullying/harassment figures are:

    12% Yes,
    8% prefer not to say (not sure how that cannot be taken as more yes's)
    80% No

    Mind you, I am not sure admitting my mistake helps HMRC management.

    ReplyDelete
  7. In what way was his trip to Washington a "junket"?

    ReplyDelete