HMRC's £186m Masterclass in Incompetence: They Spent a Fortune to Claw Back Just £44m on the Loan Charge – Absolute Shambles
Morning, you hard-pressed taxpayers still waiting years for a refund, getting hung up on deadline day, or being chased for trivial £50 bills while HMRC's own staff rack up half a million sick days. Here's a story that sums up everything wrong with the taxman in one jaw-dropping number.
Fresh figures reveal that HMRC has blown £186 million of your money over six years trying to enforce the controversial Loan Charge on disguised remuneration schemes. And what have they actually recovered from individual settlements? A pathetic £44 million.
That's right – they spent £186m to get back £44m. For every pound recovered from those 800 individuals who settled, they burned over £4.22. Even if you take their broader claim of £250m in total settlements (including employers), it's still a catastrophic return on investment. Annual compliance costs have hit £31 million in recent years. This isn't enforcement; it's a black hole with better PR.
The Loan Charge was meant to hammer people who used "disguised pay" schemes – where contractors and others were paid via loans that never got repaid, dodging income tax and NI. Fair enough in principle if it was pure avoidance. But the way HMRC and the government handled it has been a textbook case of retrospective overreach, ruining lives, driving some to suicide, and now proving to be an expensive, inefficient disaster.
MPs and campaigners are calling it a "profound failure". No wonder. While HMRC was pouring millions into this crackdown, they couldn't answer phones, process refunds, or stop issuing phantom £2.8 billion demands to small businesses. They let their own compliance officer launder £3.3m and walk with a suspended sentence, but ordinary folk caught in these schemes got the full weight of retrospective legislation and aggressive pursuit.
And don't forget the human cost – families destroyed, bankruptcies, mental health crises – all while the taxman racks up costs that could have funded proper helplines or actual customer service instead of this botched vendetta.
This is peak HMRC: incompetent, wasteful, and utterly contemptuous of value for money. They demand perfection and instant compliance from us (with penalty points and automatic fines), yet when they go after a target, they manage to lose money hand over fist. £186m spent to recover £44m? That's not closing the tax gap – that's widening the incompetence gap to Olympic proportions.
Rachel Reeves and her mandarins love lecturing about "fairness" and "closing loopholes", but when their own enforcement machine turns into the world's most expensive paper-shredder, the only people getting fairly screwed are the long-suffering British taxpayer.
Tax does have to be taxing.
But when HMRC spends £186 million to
claw back £44 million while the rest of us drown in red tape and MTD
quarterly reporting hell? That's not taxing – that's institutional theft and breathtaking incompetence on a grand scale.
Amazon "HMRC Waste Survival Kit" Suggestions
(affiliate links – because watching them burn your money deserves a stiff drink)
- Giant Calculator – to work out how much they're wasting this week
- "£186m Down the Drain" Mug – fill with something stronger than tea
- Industrial Shredder – ironic tribute to their efficiency
- Stress Ball (Taxman Shape) – squeeze until the next scandal breaks
- "Value for Money?" T-shirt – wear it to your next tribunal
This article highlights that we have much more work to do in holding HMRC accountable.
ReplyDeleteWe will continue to expose wrongdoing - despite the online abuse received - for as long as it takes to restore integrity into His Majesty's Revenue and Customs. Britain deserves better.
Who is this "we".
DeleteAnd are you prepared to let us know the details of any wrongdoing that you have exposed.
Just one example.
One teeny-weeny example.
@21:23 I believe they're a group who expose misconduct at HMRC
Delete@09:46.
DeleteThanks for that. Can you (or they/him) give any examples of misconduct or corruption that they've exposed.
@11:37 I understand they had the 'exclusive' about hmrc's field force staff driving BMWs
DeleteNo they didn't. The original allegation was made by a former field force officer and confirmed by a FoI request.
DeleteDespite trying to claim credit 'Exposing the Corrupt' had sweet FA to do with it.
Any real examples?
The architects will be long gone in a sideways move to the Department of Agriculture to improve their competencies.
ReplyDeleteFamilies have been destroyed, regardless of what bullshit story they tell themselves.
https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/26047903.hmrc-manager-took-part-graphic-sexualised-online-chats-girls/
ReplyDeleteThis is absolutely abhorrent. What a vile, pathetic pervert.
DeleteThis reminds us, again, that HMRC needs to vet and re-vet any and all staff who have public contact to an 'Enhanced' standard by DBS. Existing staff should be re-vetted every 3-5 years. It's a gap in public safety that HMRC has persistently failed to address.
I also hope the unduly lenient sentence will be appealed. Disgusting HMRC nonce
@13:54.
DeleteI'm not paying to read the article but did the culprit have previous?
Would a DBS check have flagged anything up?
With or without "previous" convictions, an enhanced DBS will flag up intelligence that sits on local and national police systems.
DeleteIt's the same standard to which people are vetted who work for the police or in settings like schools, care homes, hospitals.
HMRC have a responsibility to minimise any risks posed by sicko employees - this case should serve as a wake up call to senior management.
@17:42.
DeleteWithout a previous arrest or conviction the chances of intelligence being held on police systems is vanishingly small.
@12:20 You'd be surprised as to what intelligence police hold on those who have never been arrested, charged or convicted.
DeleteHMRC appear negligent.
We echo the above comments.
DeleteSurely HMRC will conduct a comprehensive review into who he had contact with in the course of his official duties?
Anyone have experience of working with this sick offender? Did colleagues raise any concerns?
He's brought HMRC into disrepute - we live in deeply worrying times -how many more are there?
Shocking. The standard of HMRC staff has fallen. Public trust and confidence eroded. The organisation needs to be rebuilt with fresh leadership and a P45 for all staff who lack decency and integrity
DeleteHas this nonce been sacked by HMRC??
DeleteHow do these people manage to secure employment with HMRC?
DeleteThe checks need to be more stringent.
@13:47 That's my greatest concern - field force and compliance staff visit people in their homes but aren't checked to the 'Enhanced' DBS level
DeleteI worked for and served HMRC (and formerly the Inland Revenue) over multiple decades. It's depressing to see the stark drop in standards; it appears to be an issue that's accelerated in the past 10 years. I would recommend increasing salaries a bit while reducing the workforce numbers commensurately. Higher calibre staff will more than make up for all the dross that needs weeding out of this decayed organisation.
Delete@16:15 on 27 April 2026
DeleteThe silence is defeaning. Not a single person has stepped forward to condemn this sex offender (an HMRC emoloyee) and his horrific crimes. It speaks volumes.
@07:09 I've certainly condemned this horrible human being. By all means, call out HMRC, or even his colleagues, for failing to unequivocally condemn his behaviour, but there are many of us who are utterly appalled that people like this gain employment with HMRC.
Delete@10:51.
DeleteJust out of interest how do you know that his colleagues haven't unequivocally condemned his behaviour?
The reason criminals gain employment is usually because they keep their criminality secret. Think Harold Shipman.
@11:51 Did I miss a statement from HMRC in which they condemned his crime, made clear that his colleagues also condemn his sick behaviour, and offered reassurance to the general public? No, thought not.
DeleteHMRC haven't even confirmed that this ghastly person has been sacked.
As an accountant who deals with HMRC routinely, I wish I could say that I'm surprised, but...
@12:09.
DeleteSo you don't know whether his colleagues condemn his behaviour or not.
Thanks for that.
Spoiler alert - they certainly will condemn his behaviour.
@12:38 How do you know that they "will condemn his behaviour"? Why haven't they then?
DeletePs. Are you their unpaid, official unofficial spokesman? Dreaming that your betters might throw you a crumb from the table 😏 🤣 🤡
They will condemn his behaviour because HMRC staff are recruited from the general public and the general public don't like sex offenders.
Delete"Why haven't they" - so you know for a fact that they haven't?
So we have had it on here that HMRC staff are educationally sub-normal, clinically obese, financially corrupt, lazy, communists dedicated to the overthrow of democratic society. And now they all support sex offenders apparently.
Have you ever considered that it might be you that has the problem 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
07:17 and 11:41
DeleteAs a fact, there has been no public statement from HMRC condemning their nonce employee.
HMRC have also failed to confirm that he is no longer in their employ.
Hope these facts help to clarify matters for everyone.
No right minded person would try to defend HMRC in the absence of any public statement on the case.
@11:41 Have you discussed your issues with your shrink? You have my pity. Get well soon 😂
Delete@13:52.
DeleteAs usual you have got hold of the wrong end of the stick.
Nobody is defending HMRC in this.
I was defending his former colleagues who are being slandered as supporters of a convicted sex offender without a shred of evidence. But then I forgot - you don't do evidence do you.
@14:05.
DeleteYou think that because people work for our tax authority then they must be supporters of a sex offender.
And you think I've got issues? 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
These sick people should be locked up for a very long time !!!!
ReplyDeleteAI, makes stuff up, it's called 'hallucination'.
ReplyDeleteI'm sure HMRC are aware of this, unless they're not, which means if it's being used on official sensitive data they should have prepared excuses when it all goes to shit.
Making it a free disco for 28k staff isn't very smart.
https://www.accountancydaily.co/28k-staff-given-copilot-major-ai-rollout-hmrc
In a surprise to nobody whatsoever, HMRC are named and shamed. It seems the department has a number of sneaky little grifters.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/consumer-affairs/civil-servants-faking-office-attendance/
If you want the country back to a decent society, with fair opportunity for all and vexing issues like HMRC corruption properly actioned, make sure you vote for Restore Britain or Reform UK in the local and national elections today. Vote tactically to keep the Far Left Loonies out!!!
ReplyDeleteNeither Restore nor Reform have mentioned anything about HMRC in their respective policies/manifestos.
DeleteIn fact, other than stopping immigration for people with brown skin and cutting tax for their billionaire donors they're remarkably light on policy.
Have you remembered any corruption that you've exposed yet?
Thought not.
What on earth do you mean?
DeleteWe were the driving force that exposed the scandal!!!
We detect either 1) a green eyed monster or 2) someone on here to defend HMRC...an employee...a member of the Comms team by any chance?
We see you 👀 😏
@13:23.
Delete"The driving force" 🤣🤣🤣.
You forget that Ken has the copies of the original HMRC replies which name the author of the FoI.
And it certainly wasn't you.