At the beginning of July I noted that HMRC had issued a consultation on Extra Statutory Concession AS19, and that:
"HMRC are proposing a significant watering down of ESC A19".Under ESC A19, which has been a feature of the UK's tax system for around 40 years, tax arrears may be waived when HMRC has failed to use information available to it to assess an individual's tax liabilities on time.
The Tax Faculty of the ICAEW is none too impressed with the proposed revisions to A19 either, and has set out its views; a.o. it notes:
"we do not agree with the removal of the reasonable belief test and its replacement by a responsibilities test in the form set out in this consultation document. As currently drafted the test is not acceptable.Here are the Faculty's views in full:
The responsibilities for taxpayers are too onerous and unclear. The responsibilities for HMRC are limited and insufficiently rigorous.....
..until it can be shown that HMRC’s operation of the PAYE system is consistently meeting an agreed service standard, the exceptional circumstances test should be kept...
..we think the proposed requirement for taxpayers to contact HMRC before the end of the tax year in which the underpayment is notified is not reasonable."
"The concession should not be revised on the lines proposed by HMRC
Tax does have to be taxing.ICAEW does not support HMRC’s proposed revision of Extra-statutory Concession (ESC) A19, although we agree that a review is needed of the concession and how it is operated.Our views are set out in TAXREP 46/12, submitted on 24 September 2012 in response to the consultation document Extra-statutory Concession A19 review published on 3 July 2012.The current concession and the proposalsUnder ESC A19, HMRC will write off income tax and capital gains tax where HMRC has been slow to use information and tell the taxpayer about an underpayment, and the taxpayer could reasonably have believed their tax was correct.We summarised HMRC’s proposals in our news item Consultation on Extra-statutory Concession A19 in July 2012. HMRC proposes that the revised concession would apply from April main proposed changes are:· To replace the ‘reasonable belief’ test with a responsibilities test.· To scrap the ‘exceptional circumstances’ test, which (broadly) applies where HMRC has made repeated failures.· To restrict ESC A19 to income tax, ie it would no longer apply to CGT.· To introduce a time limit for taxpayers to ask for ESC A19 to be applied.The Tax Faculty’s views on the proposalsESC A19 is an important concession which provides fairness for taxpayers where HMRC is at fault. We should like to emphasise the importance of retaining it within the tax system.We agree that a review of ESC A19 is needed. There are difficulties with the operation of the concession in its current form, particularly the application of the ‘reasonable belief’ test.However, we do not support the proposed revised text of ESC A19 as set out in the consultation document. It should not be introduced in April 2013. In particular, the responsibilities test as drafted is not fair or workable (though there may be merits in such a test – see below), and we do not agree with the other proposals which restrict the scope of the concession.1. Responsibilities test v reasonable belief testThere is evidence that the current ‘reasonable belief’ test does cause difficulties and is not being applied consistently by HMRC. In establishing whether a taxpayer ‘could reasonably have believed that his or her tax affairs were in order’, it is hard to remove a degree of subjectivity.A responsibilities test would mean, in broad terms, that if HMRC has failed to meet its responsibilities but the taxpayer has met theirs, ESC A19 can apply. This has the potential to make the application of ESC A19 more objective and therefore fairer for the taxpayer, and has worked well in the context of disputed tax credit overpayments. Therefore we think the idea should be explored further.However, we do not agree with the removal of the reasonable belief test and its replacement by a responsibilities test in the form set out in this consultation document. As currently drafted the test is not acceptable. The responsibilities for taxpayers are too onerous and unclear. The responsibilities for HMRC are limited and insufficiently rigorous. And most importantly, no such test should be introduced until HMRC is able to provide clear information for taxpayers about their responsibilities and how to fulfil them.We think that ESC A19 should be retained in its current form, ie with the reasonable belief test, and not be replaced unless and until a workable responsibilities test can be devised. In the meantime HMRC should work on improving the operation of the reasonable belief test, and on developing better information and guidance for taxpayers on ESC A19 and on PAYE matters generally.2. Exceptional circumstancesThe exceptional circumstances test is designed to deal with situations where HMRC makes repeated failures. HMRC argues that the advent of the NPS system, and RTI from next year, should mean that is processed in a more timely fashion, and thus remove the need for the exceptional circumstances test in future. However, until it can be shown that HMRC’s operation of the PAYE system is consistently meeting an agreed service standard, the exceptional circumstances test should be kept.3. Capital gains taxWhile we accept that ESC A19 is not likely to apply often to CGT, we can envisage situations where it could. We see no need to narrow the scope of the concession without good reason Therefore the ESC A19 should continue to apply to CGT.4. Time limitsWe have no objection to introducing a time limit for claiming ESC A19. We agree that it is better if taxpayers approach HMRC sooner rather than later.However, we think the proposed requirement for taxpayers to contact HMRC before the end of the tax year in which the underpayment is notified is not reasonable. If an underpayment was notified in (say) March, it would be unfair to expect the taxpayer to contact HMRC before 6 April.If there is to be a time limit, we propose a four-year limit in line with the current limit for claims, with an additional limit of one year from when the underpayment is notified if this gives a later date than the four-year limit."
Professional Cover Against the Threat of Costly TAX and VAT Investigations
Insurance to protect you against the cost of enquiry or dispute with HMRC is available from several sources including Solar Taxwise.
Ken Frost has negotiated a 10% discount on any polices that may suit your needs.
However, neither Ken Frost nor HMRCISSHITE either endorses or recommends their services.
What is TAXWISE?
TAXWISE is a tax-fee protection service that will pay up to £75,000 towards your accountant's fees in the event of an HM Revenue & Customs full enquiry or dispute.
To find out more, please use this link Taxwise
Tax Investigation for Dummies, by Nick Morgan, provides a good and easy to read guide for anyone caught up in an HMRC tax investigation. A must read for any Self Assessment taxpayer.
Click the link to read about: Tax Investigation for Dummies
HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"