Showing posts with label non doms. Show all posts
Showing posts with label non doms. Show all posts

Thursday, 26 September 2024

The Road To Ruin is Paved With Good Intentions - Labour's Non-Dom Taxation Farce



Starmer has promised a tax crackdown on non-domiciled individuals (non-doms), aiming to funnel more money into public services like schools and hospitals. However, recent reports suggest that this plan might backfire spectacularly, potentially leaving a £1 billion hole in the Treasury's budget.

The Non-Dom Dilemma

Non-doms are individuals who reside in the UK but claim their permanent home (domicile) is outside the country. This status allows them to avoid paying UK tax on foreign income, provided it isn't brought into the UK. Labour's plan to abolish this status is intended to close what they see as a loophole exploited by the wealthy to dodge taxes.

The Financial Fallout

Despite the "noble" intentions, experts and officials are raising alarms about the potential fallout. Treasury officials fear that the crackdown could actually reduce tax revenues rather than increase them. The reasoning is straightforward: non-doms contribute significantly to the UK economy, not just through taxes but also through investments and spending. Stripping them of their tax advantages will prompt an exodus of these high-net-worth individuals, taking their money and investments with them.

A £1 Billion Shortfall

The most alarming aspect of this plan is the projected £1 billion shortfall in the government's budget for essential services. This gap could severely impact funding for schools and hospitals, undermining the very public services Labour aims to support. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has expressed concerns that the plan could end up costing the government money, rather than generating the expected windfall.

Unintended Consequences

The exodus of non-doms will have broader economic repercussions. These individuals often invest in UK businesses, real estate, and other ventures, contributing to job creation and economic growth. Their departure will lead to a contraction in these areas, further exacerbating the economic impact.

Conclusion

While the idea of taxing the wealthy more heavily is popular with socialist dreamers, Labour's non-dom taxation plan appears to be fraught with risks and unintended consequences. The potential £1 billion shortfall in funding for critical public services like schools and hospitals is a stark reminder that well-intentioned policies often lead to disastrous outcomes. It is crucial to consider the broader economic implications and ensure that any tax reforms are both fair and fiscally responsible.

Tax does have to be taxing.

Tax Investigation Insurance

Market leading tax fee protection insurance for businesses, sole traders and individuals. Protect yourself from accountancy fees in the event of an HMRC enquiry.

Having a Solar Protect Tax Investigation Insurance policy at your disposal means that should you be one of the many 1000's of businesses or individuals that are selected by HMRC each year to look into your tax affairs your own accountant (your tax return agent) can get on and defend you robustly.

You have the peace of mind knowing that your accountant's (your tax return agent) fees will be paid by the insurance without any Excess for you to find.

Tax Investigation Insurance is an insurance policy that will fully reimburse your accountant's (your tax return agent) fees up to £100,000 if you are subject to enquiry by or dispute with HMRC.

A Solar Protect policy will enable your accountant (your tax return agent) to:

  • Deal with any correspondence from HMRC
  • Attend any meeting with HMRC
  • Appeal to the First-tier Tribunal or Upper Tribunal
  • Having the security of knowing that fees will be met in full will enable your Accountant (your tax return agent) to defend your position robustly

Please click here for details.

HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Tuesday, 12 March 2013

The Government's Confused Tax Policy



David Cameron has stated that he wants to roll out the red carpet for wealthy foreigners.

For why?

They spend money here on products and services, additionally some of them also invest in businesses in the UK; all of which is good for the county's finances.

However, the 2008 Budget (pre coalition) introduced the £30,000 non-domicile levy.

The basic premise of this levy is that it enables the non-domiciliary to retain the remittance basis of taxation beyond 5 April 2008 but at a cost. If the remittance basis is not opted for, the non-domiciled individual is taxed on their worldwide income and gains in the same way as a UK domiciled individual.

Pinsent Masons have published the results of an FoI request that shows that the number of UK taxpayers registered with HMRC as non-domiciled (non-doms) has fallen by 2,000 in a year, and that the number of non-doms in the UK has fallen by 17% from 140,000 to 116,000 since the levy was introduced in 2008.

Jason Collins, head of tax at Pinsent Masons, is quoted by Accountancylive:
"The UK’s tax code is seen as becoming increasingly hostile to high net worths.

The non-dom levy is part of a series of measures – both implemented and threatened – including the annual property tax and mansion taxes, the 50/45p tax rate and capital gains tax increases, which are driving highly mobile wealthy individuals from the UK.

Non doms are more important to the UK economy now than ever before. They have a choice about where to live. They have huge spending power, invest in businesses and create jobs. They can’t do this if they aren’t here – and there are plenty of other countries competing to welcome them to their shores.

Policy on attracting high net worths to the UK is inconsistent. On the one hand we have entrepreneur visas and investor visas trying to boost the numbers of wealthy migrants, but on the other hand, wealthy migrants are being driven away by the non-dom levy and the constant stream of new measures to tax them more heavily, creating lots of uncertainty."
This is not the only area of the government's taxation policy that is "confused" and inconsistent; eg the ever increasing complexity of the tax system is at odds with the government's "promises" to simplify it.

Tax does have to be taxing.

Professional Cover Against the Threat of Costly TAX and VAT Investigations

Insurance to protect you against the cost of enquiry or dispute with HMRC is available from several sources including Solar Tax Investigation Insurance.

Ken Frost has negotiated a 10% discount on any polices that may suit your needs.

However, neither Ken Frost nor HMRCISSHITE either endorses or recommends their services.

What is Solar Tax Investigation Insurance?

Solar Tax Investigation Insurance is a tax-fee protection service that will pay up to £75,000 towards your accountant's fees in the event of an HM Revenue & Customs full enquiry or dispute.

To find out more, please use this link Solar Tax Investigation Insurance



Tax Investigation for Dummies, by Nick Morgan, provides a good and easy to read guide for anyone caught up in an HMRC tax investigation. A must read for any Self Assessment taxpayer.

Click the link to read about: Tax Investigation for Dummies

HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Thursday, 27 March 2008

Above The Law

HMRC at work
HMRC are becoming a little too full of themselves these days.

John Cassidy, PKF Accountants tax investigations partner, has stated on Director of Finance Online that HMRC has little regard for the central tenets of the English legal system, by presuming taxpayers are guilty.

He cites the recent spewing forth from the HMRC bunker of 5000 letters to offshore account holders, demanding an explanation on funds "about which it knows little".

Quote:

"In many cases, HMRC only knows that someone has an offshore bank account and the funds it contains at a few specific dates.

It has little idea how much interest was earned on the deposits, where the money came from or the key question of whether there is an undeclared UK tax liability at all.

Legally, to issue an assessment for unpaid tax, HMRC must have made a discovery or, in other words, have actual knowledge that further tax is due, not just that it might be due. Yet the threat is that such assessments will definitely be issued unless informal, voluntary answers are given to the questions raised
."

HMRC should remember that no one, and no organisation, is above the law.

Tax does have to be taxing.

HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com) is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Wednesday, 12 March 2008

HMRC's Gordian Knot

HMRC's Gordian Knot
There has been a veritable avalanche of newspaper articles and TV reports about the proposed changes to the so called "non dom" rules, which are planned to come into force from the 6th of April.

The majority of the reports and articles focus on the so called "wealthy non doms", who in the eyes of some are paying far less than their "fair share" of tax. Some believe that the imposition of the new rule will ensure that they will be made to pay what they "should".

This argument of course ignores the fact that these individual invariably generate wealth and prosperity for the country via their businesses and activities.

However, leaving the "wealthy" aside, this proposed legislation will affect others as well.

Under current "non dom" rules, income and capital gains from overseas investments and assets are only liable to UK tax if remitted or brought into the UK.

Under the proposed new legislation, drafted by HMRC, unless overseas income is below £1,000 the "cost" of choosing to be taxed on the remittance basis will be £30K a year (where the non dom has been resident in the UK for seven or more years) as well as the loss of the personal allowance and the annual capital gains tax exemption.

The alternative to the £30K fee is to pay UK tax on worldwide income and gains. This of course means that you have to be registered as a taxpayer in the UK.

However, there remains the thorny and politically embarrassing issue of illegal immigrants:

- The Home office estimate that there are 310,000 - 570,000 illegals in the UK
- Migration Watch estimate that there are 515,000 - 870,000 illegals in the UK

It is safe to assume that none of these people are registered in the UK tax system, therefore once they have been here for 7 years they are classified (under the proposed new rules) as "non doms".

This means that they will have to pay £30K.

Needless to say, this will not happen.

Now here is where it becomes rather messy for the government, by not paying the £30K fee and by not registering for tax the illegals will be committing offences under the laws relating to money laundering.

At first glance this may seem to be irrelevant, if they are illegal they should be deported and the problem is solved.

Not quite, for you see an offence under the money laundering rules is a criminal offence which requires a jail term.

The jails are already full, and the illegals are meant to be deported.

This rule change will cripple the government's drive to reduce the number of illegal immigrants living here.

As Alistair Darling presents his first budget today, he might want to think about how he can unravel this Gordian knot of his own creation.

Happy Budget Day!

Tax does have to be taxing.

HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com) is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Tuesday, 29 January 2008

The Dog's Dinner

The Dog's DinnerHMRC, and its masters in the government, are facing a backlash from tax professionals about the draft legislation on tax hikes for non-domiciles.

Mike Warburton, Grant Thornton senior tax partner, made a succinct point describing the arrangements for non-doms as a "dog's dinner".

He noted that US bankers, who make up a large proportion of those who claim non-dom status, would face a doubling of their tax liabilities under the new rules.

Needless to say this would mean that many would consider moving elsewhere, with a consequent diminution in tax take and reduction in economic contribution to the UK economy.

In other words, the new rules would be detrimental to the UK.

Taxation and the HMRC should not be used as a tool of politicians to satisfy their own personal prejudices. Taxation and the HMRC should only be used to collect revenue necessary to fund approved government expenditure.

HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com) is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"