It seems that thousands of complaints about incorrect tax bills, codes and unpaid credits are being thrown out by HMRC without investigated by an impartial adjudicator.
Money Mail reports that one in 40 people who have been fobbed off by HMRC has their case heard by an independent adjudicator.
Seemingly people often don’t know they
have the right to escalate their complaint to the Adjudicator’s Office,
where they can get an impartial hearing. Additionally, people cannot email the Adjudicator's Office.
For why?
HMRC funds the Adjudicator’s Office, and refuses to cover
the cost of setting up this service.
I would ask at this point, how can the Adjudicator's Office be independent if it is funded by HMRC?
Elaine Clark, managing director of
accountancy firm CheapAccounting, is quoted:
‘HMRC is clearly not doing enough to highlight the adjudicator service to taxpayers. And even those that do know about it often don’t have the energy or expertise to take on that fight.Many will have been repeatedly stonewalled and are so worn down that they would rather give up and move on — which is worrying because time and time again, HMRC will tell you they are right even when they are wrong.’
Between
April 2017 and March 2018 HMRC received 77,410 complaints. Of
these, almost four in ten — 39 per cent — were fully upheld in the first
instance. A further 15 per cent were partially upheld.
This means 30,190 were resolved fully, leaving 47,220 either only half settled or rejected entirely.
If you are unhappy with the outcome at this stage you can request that HMRC reviews your complaint again.
Of
the complaints referred back to HMRC in the last tax year, 19 per cent
were fully upheld. Another 22 per cent were partially upheld.
If
all cases that were only partially upheld or rejected completely were
referred back to HMRC, it means a further 8,972 complaints were fully
upheld at this second stage of the complaints system.
This leaves 38,248 cases where customers received only a partial result or had their complaint thrown out.
It is at this point that HMRC should tell you about your right to escalate your complaint to the independent adjudicator.
However, of the 38,248 complaints
not fully upheld in the last tax year, just 943 were referred to the
independent Adjudicator’s Office — around one in 40.
Many
of these may not have been winnable. But last year the adjudicator
upheld around four in ten (39 per cent) of the complaints it dealt with.
In
its annual report, the adjudicator says:
‘There is evidence to suggest that for every customer who complains to an organisation, there are many more who have been treated similarly who do not.’
A
spokesman for the Adjudicator’s Office says HMRC could do more to
inform customers using its complaints process about how and when to
access its service, as well as make it easier for them to do so.
Here is the address you should write to:
The
Adjudicator’s Office,
PO Box 10280,
Nottingham,
NG2 9PF
or call 0300 057
1111 between 9am and 5pm Monday to Friday.
Tax does have to be taxing.
Professional Cover Against the Threat of Costly TAX and VAT Investigations
Insurance to protect you against the cost of enquiry or dispute with HMRC is available from several sources including Solar Tax Investigation Insurance.
Ken Frost has negotiated a 10% discount on any polices that may suit your needs.
However, neither Ken Frost nor HMRCISSHITE either endorses or recommends their services.
What is Solar Tax Investigation Insurance?
Solar Tax Investigation Insurance is a tax-fee protection service that will pay up to £75,000 towards your accountant's fees in the event of an HM Revenue & Customs full enquiry or dispute.
To find out more, please use this link Solar Tax Investigation Insurance
HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"
Cos it's not independent. All part of the casual corruption of HMRC by senior management. No morals. Utter filth.
ReplyDeleteIt is important to understand what the Adjudicator can do, and that is limited to outright mistakes,delays, obviously crap advice obnoxious staff behaviour and lack use of discretion (which of course HMRC staff mostly now don't have)
ReplyDeletePolicy? Could appeal it via FTT or Court? Being investigated or subject to any form of Enquiry no matter how grotesque?
Forget it.
Overall, a weak mechanism to hipefully deal with obvious maladministration.
With a budget if £2m that was under spent by £212k in 2016/7 even after gifts to Charities, would have thought that setting up an email service might not be beyond them in an age where Digital Engagement with HMRC is becoming mandatory.
Apparently not.
And everyone is surprised?!
ReplyDeleteThis lot could not be trusted running a tombola stall at the village fete.
No, not surprised. Is it me, or is there a conflict of interest here? What are the penalties for having a complaint upheld by the Adjudicators Office, an Aldi Gift Voucher?
ReplyDeleteWhat it would do, in my opinion, is skewer the statistics if there were more formal complaints up held. There is only so much PR and Double Speak can achieve. Nobody wants the slime to squirm in their chairs at a Treasury Select Committee.
When I read this, it reminded me of when the pukes closed all the Enquiry Centres. Putting up a load of obstacles several years before, having to make an appointment to talk to another human. Directing the public to helplines. Then after several years of being 'fobbed off', stopped bothering altogether. Then, is if by magic, the Enquiry Centres were closed with dropping numbers used as a pretext. The offices themselves shortly thereafter.
Plenty of the shite have now retired, or moved sideways with big smiles and fat pensions.
I recommend a book called "The Establishment" by Owen Jones, which explains all this merry do round gravy train in more detail.
There might be a few surprises to look forward to. Enjoy.
HMRC have a Big chief who is "fascinated by leadership". What more do people want?
ReplyDeletePossibly a Big Chief who is competent at his job ??
Delete