Football is clearly becoming a wee fetish of HMRC.
AccountancyAge reports that the Upper Tribunal has rejected an appeal from HMRC in a case relating to the taxation of termination payments made to football player employees of Tottenham Hotspur Limited.
In 2016, the First-Tier Tribunal ruled that certain termination
payments made to two players contracted to the football club – Wilson
Palacios and Peter Crouch – were not taxable as earnings from their
employment. The tribunal also found that the payments were not subject
to national insurance contributions (NICs).
Palacios and Crouch had received lump sum payments on early
termination of their employment contracts, with both players joining
Stoke City in a transfer deal. Palacios received £900,000 once the
transfer was made, plus an additional £510,000 paid on 15 August 2012.
Crouch agreed a deal with Tottenham Hotspur under which he received a
“termination payment” of £3m in three equal instalments following the
termination of his employment with the club on 31 August 2011.
The Upper Tribunal said that the question was whether the payments
were to be treated as general “earnings from employment” or an
“emolument of the employment”, or as payment received in connection with
the termination of employment. The Tribunal said that it was “common
ground” that if the payments were “from an employment”, then the first
£30,000 would be subject to tax, and the payment would be subject to
NICs.
HMRC had argued that the payments “represented earnings from the
players’ employments” and were therefore subject to income tax and NICs.
Tottenham appealed HMRC’s decision in 2015, advocating that the
payments “represented compensation for the early termination of the
players’ contracts”, and were therefore not “from” employment.
The Upper Tribunal upheld the decision of the First-Tier Tribunal. It
said that there was a distinction between cases where “the entire
contract of employment is abrogated in exchange for the termination
payment” and cases where “the payment is made in pursuance of a
pre-existing obligation to make such a payment arising under a contract
of employment”. Both the cases of Palacios and Crouch “fell squarely”
into the first category, the Tribunal said.
An HMRC spokesperson
said that the Revenue believed it had applied the
correct tax treatment to the payments and was pursuing its appeal of the
First-tier Tribunal’s decision.
Tax does have to be taxing.
Professional Cover Against the Threat of Costly TAX and VAT Investigations
Insurance to protect you against the cost of enquiry or dispute with HMRC is available from several sources including Solar Tax Investigation Insurance.
Ken Frost has negotiated a 10% discount on any polices that may suit your needs.
However, neither Ken Frost nor HMRCISSHITE either endorses or recommends their services.
What is
Solar Tax Investigation Insurance?
Solar Tax Investigation Insurance is a tax-fee protection service that will pay up to £75,000 towards your accountant's fees in the event of an HM Revenue & Customs full enquiry or dispute.
To find out more, please use this link
Solar Tax Investigation Insurance
HMRC Is Shite (
www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain
www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by
www.kenfrost.com "
The Living Brand"