Showing posts with label processing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label processing. Show all posts

Friday, 27 August 2010

The Joys of Self Employment

Bullingdon Club
As if it were not already difficult enough starting out as self employed, HMRC have managed to add to the burden by increasing the amount of time it takes to register with them as self employed.

HMRC have issued an apology noting that the turnaround times for newly self-employed people to register will increase to eight weeks, between now and October 31 2010.

It seems that processing times for paper form 64-8 and registrations for self-assessment will also increase over the next two months.

HMRC staff are being moved to "higher priority work", hence the delays in processing these forms.

Maybe the best way to avoid the delays and hassle, and to reduce the admin burden on HMRC to enable them to work on "high priority stuff", is to opt out of the tax system?

Would HMRC and the government approve of that?:)

Tax does have to be taxing.

Professional Cover Against the Threat of Costly TAX and VAT Investigations

What is TAXWISE?

TAXWISE is a tax-fee protection service that will pay up to £75,000 towards your accountant's fees in the event of an HM Revenue & Customs full enquiry or dispute.

To find out more, please use this link Taxwise

Tax Investigation for Dummies, by Nick Morgan, provides a good and easy to read guide for anyone caught up in an HMRC tax investigation. A must read for any Self Assessment taxpayer.

Click the link to read about: Tax Investigation for Dummies

HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Monday, 4 February 2008

Security Issues

Security Issues
There is an interesting comment that has been posted on Youtube, relating to outsourced processing activities allegedly being carried out by Fujitsu in Liverpool for HMRC.

The post, if it is true, alleges some pretty serious security shortcomings wrt the processing of tax credit forms.

Here is the comment in full, I have not corrected the grammar or spelling:

"It isnt HMRC but Fujitsu Services currently have the contract for supplying IT services to HMRC that is at fault. In netherton(liverpool) where they process tax credit forms & CIS forms the managers there employ users to key this data into their system without even security checks & people who claim newtax credit have their details sent over email by IT staff without any security enabled, plus peoples details are recorded on CD-roms and left lying around in unlocked cupboards

Also there was newtax claiments details internally copied by users but breaches like this are never highlighted to HMRC and covered up! HMRC should be made aware of the sloppy practices of Fujitsu services and if they renew the contract with them, it will cost them dearly both in money and security.
Be aware Mr Gordan Brown
!"

Does anyone have any more information about this?

Please get in touch if you do.

Thanks.

Tax does have to be taxing.

HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com) is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Friday, 1 February 2008

HMRC Highly Commended

HMRC Highly Commended
Congratulations to HMRC for being highly commended on 22nd January 2008.

For what?

Why, for their Tax Self Assessment Online system of course!

Don't believe me?

Go to
The awards are the UK's highest level commendation for the best e-Government and technology-driven services- services which, through innovative online delivery or IT implementation, have positively transformed the lives of citizens, local communities, business and stakeholder groups.

Here you can see why
HMRC was highly commended:

"HMRC Self Assessment Online is a tremendous success for eGovernment and HMRC in particular. This year Self Assessment surpassed unprecedented demand with an improved customer experience.

HMRC successfully managed an overall 45% year-on-year uplift in online self assessment filings and an increase of almost 100% over the peak period up to 31st January 2007. This remarkable increase verified the confidence of taxpayers in the security, availability, speed, accuracy and efficiency of processing over paper-based filing
."

Remember folks, we the taxpayers are confident in the speed, security and efficiency of this system.

Are they taking the piss?

HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com) is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Wednesday, 23 January 2008

HMRC Plays Hide and Seek

HMRC Plays Hide and SeekHMRC likes to claim that it is very keen to "consult" with the hapless taxpayer and finance professional over new proposals. Unfortunately, the reality and practicality of interaction in this "consultation" process leaves something to be desired.

Links to two new consultation documents have not appeared in HMRC's "What's New" page in recent weeks. One of the consultations does not even appear on HMRC's "consultation" page, only making a guest appearance on the Treasury website.

The consultation entitled "Benefits in kind and expense payments in the payroll - a fresh approach" was published in December by HMRC, together with an impact assessment of "Including Benefits in Kind and Expense payments in the payroll."

HMRC's "What's New" showed details of the impact assessment, but no details of or links to the actual consultation.

HMRC's Stamp Taxes:Technical Newsletter - issue 6, appeared on the website on 16 January. It claimed that there has been a consultation document "Stamp duty land tax: ensuring fairness for all" in circulation for the last month.

HMRC claimed that:

"On 17 December 2007 the Government published a consultation document seeking views on its proposals. More details about this consultation can be found on the HM Treasury website".

This was not up on the HMRC site in December/early January, yet the closing date for consultation is 8th February.

Why is that then?

Are HMRC trying to cut down on the amount of interaction that they have with the taxpayer and finance professionals?

The government claims in its "consultations code" that consultation should last for a minimum of 12 weeks, yet HMRC does not follow that guidance.

-Why?

-What are they afraid of?

-What are they trying to hide?

HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com) is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Tuesday, 15 January 2008

Back To The Future

Back To The FutureYou know the old saying "What goes around, comes around"?

Well, HMRC are putting it into practice using their recent summary of responses to last year's consultation papers as an excuse.

HMRC have proudly announced that they will begin the process of working with interested parties on the development of a Taxpayers' Charter, which will set out both taxpayer rights and responsibilities in a single document.

That's fine and dandy.

One small point, HMRC had one of these charters before...but withdrew it.

The IR167 Charter for Inland Revenue Taxpayers was withdrawn on 23 June 2003, and replaced by 'Customer Service Standards' which were of little use to man or beast.

Why then are HMRC trumpeting their charter announcement as though it was a fresh, innovative idea?

An attempt at spin perhaps?

www.hmrcisshite.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Tuesday, 8 January 2008

Resignation II

Resignation
Further to my earlier article today about the resignation (or "planned departure") of Stuart Cruickshank (CFO of HMRC), I am advised by one of my chums that the intranet announcement that went around HMRC yesterday quoted the acting chairman of HMRC saying that the process of finding a successor will start "shortly".

Errmmm...shouldn't they have started this a little bit earlier, especially if they knew that the guy was only on a one year contract?

It sounds to me as though neither HMRC, nor Cruickshank, knew that he was going to be leaving quite so quickly.

What a mess!

Where do I apply?

www.hmrcisshite.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Friday, 7 December 2007

Saying Sorry

Saying Sorry
You know how that saying sorry can be a very painful and troubling process for some people?

Well, that's not the case for the good old boys from the HMRC.

As soon as it was reported that they lost the data records for 25 million people, and put those people's personal security at risk for the next 20 years, HMRC were on the case immediately with an apology letter.

Over 7 million were sent.

Great!

Apart from the fact that their apology letter was a breach of security, and some of those letters have got lost.

However, let us not dwell on uncomfortable realities such as those.

The important point was that a letter was sent, and everybody knows that HMRC is really sorry.

Oh, one small point...

How much did it cost to send over 7 million letters?

From the perspective of HMRC, absolutely nothing at all.

How is that?

Well, HMRC of course use our money (taxes to be precise) to pay for their costs; it's a win win situation, if you are HMRC.

The cost to the tax payers of them paying for this letter?

Oh, a mere £3M.

Money well spent!

The funny thing is that HMRC have been very reluctant to tell the taxpayers how much they were charged for sending a letter of apology.

Why would that be then?

Are HMRC ashamed of themselves?

Or is it that they don't believe that the taxpayer has the right to know what HMRC is doing with taxpayers' money?

By the way, one other small point, at a "hotseat" briefing just after Chancellor Darling admitted to the loss of data, acting chairman David Hartnett answered questions from staff through the HMRC intranet.

He was asked how much the costs of the apology letters were going to be.

He answered £2M.

Yet the reality is £3M.

How embarrassing for him, a member of HMRC who can't do their sums.

However, as I said at the outset, the cost to HMRC of saying sorry is nothing; they don't give a stuff, so why should they be bothered to get their sums right?

www.hmrcisshite.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Wednesday, 21 November 2007

Life of Misery Inside HMRC

Former employees of under-fire HM Revenue and Customs service have contacted the BBC News website to describe life inside its offices.

The news that the details of 25 million recipients of Child Benefit payments have gone missing has shone a spotlight on HMRC.

The agency collects and administers direct and indirect taxes; and pays and administers Child Benefit, Child Trust Fund and Tax Credits. It is also responsible for environmental taxes, enforcing the National Minimum Wage and recovery of student loans.

Formed in 2005 following a merger between HM Customs and Excise and the Inland Revenue, it has proved controversial since its inception.

But now it faces intense criticism after junior officials were blamed for sending computer discs with personal details of all UK families through the post - only for the discs to disappear.

Speaking anonymously - as they have signed the Official Secrets Act - two workers who recently left HMRC - have told the BBC News website that they were not surprised to hear of the blunder.

Worker A, who left after more than 10 years' service, said: "I wasn't surprised in the least when I heard the news.

The problems with Child Benefit are only the tip of the iceberg.

"Morale is non-existent. Mistakes happen continuously. Rooms full of unopened post are not uncommon.
"

Following the 2005 merger, the agency is now governed by a board made up of a chair, eight other executive directors and five non-executive directors.

Critics and unions complained that combining two distinct organisations, with very different cultures and legal powers, was always going to be a difficult task.

The government has targeted job cuts of 12,500 from the 100,000-strong workforce.

"When the merger was introduced, job duplication meant that many experienced people were made redundant," worker A said.

"So we lost many of our best people.

"Others were moved from pillar to post, and the experience hit morale even harder.

"The lowest paid were all laid off, and all of their workloads were added to everyone else's
."

He complained that after a system called "lean processing" was introduced, jobs were divided up into their individual parts - every aspect was dealt with separately, and no-one has overall ownership or responsibility for the task, he said.

"Arbitrary, individual hourly targets meant that people cut corners," he added. "It doesn't matter if you make mistakes because you won't be held accountable."

Worker B, who was in a middle management post before he left in 2006, also claimed the merger of HM Customs and Excise and the Inland Revenue negatively affected the way the departments worked.

"There was the move to using call centres, which meant that people didn't take personal responsibility any more," he said.

There were all sorts of closures of offices going on and all those sorts of things had a domino effect.

There were additional targets - stretching targets - with reductions in staff, especially experienced staff, which really didn't help the cause
."

He said he would lay the blame for the current problems "primarily at the politicians' doors".

"This is a top-down matter - due to the target-driven, staff-reducing culture."

Source BBC